Hi Richard,
On 08 Dec 2014, at 13:33, Richard Cochran wrote:
[…]
> Because providing corrections in-kernel will be spotty at best, maybe
> it better just to say, Linux drivers do *not* correct these delays. At
> leas that makes things consistent. Otherwise end users will have to
> comb through th
Delio,
Thanks for the feedback...
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:30:28AM +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote:
> We implemented this correction in our driver using a private IOCTL
> and it would have been nice to have used some standardised interface
> instead. However, I think timestamp correction belongs in
Hello Richard,
We implemented this correction in our driver using a private IOCTL and it would
have been nice to have used some standardised interface instead. However, I
think timestamp correction belongs in the PHY’s driver (or whatever is doing
the times-tamping). Data sheets report expected
