On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:47:32AM +, Jesuiter, Henry (ALC NetworX GmbH)
wrote:
> Sorry, I thought I already answered a week ago. These patches work fine for
> us, and I already integrated them in our current firmware for further real
> live tests.
That is good news, thanks!
Richard
-
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:51:10PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar
Applied.
Thanks,
Richard
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashD
Hi
I had to add an extension to the phc2sys tool and would like to ask about your
opinion about chances to get it upstream.
It's about running the phc2sys tool in the opposite direction, sys2phc, but
with a more smooth servo.
This is my Use Case: Relative (device to device) time accuracy is
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 04:33:34PM +, Urs Ritzmann wrote:
> What's your opinion. Is it worth sending patches?
Yes, this is a use case that would interest many people, I should
think.
Thanks,
Richard
--
Check out the
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:05 AM
> To: Urs Ritzmann
> Cc: 'linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' de...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] phc2sys timestamp filtering
>
> On Tue,
