On 12/03/18 12:36, Michael Brown wrote:
This is a revised patch series to ensure that the tmv_t operations are
used consistently for calculations involving hardware timestamps.
The ugly hwts_to_tmv() and hwts_sw_to_tmv() wrappers from the previous
patch series are gone. Instead we convert
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 1:56 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] differ message printed when local
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:31:38PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> I've often been looking at log output from ptp4l and wondered which
> clock id was which port. This patch helps ease the mental burden by
> explicitly stating when we selected the local clock as the best choice.
Me too. Thanks for
Make the log output a bit more clear by changing how we inform the user
when the local clock is the best master clock. This allows easier
parsing of the log and identifying when the local clock is being
selected as the best clock.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller
---
I've
This patch will remove all delay requests in queue that is older than the
latest processed. Connected responses to these are either much more delayed or
lost. Any received response derived from an obsolete request will be neglected.
Signed-off-by: Anders Selhammer
We always but braces around 'if' blocks.
Signed-off-by: Anders Selhammer
---
port.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/port.c b/port.c
index 2edfb26..5f333be 100644
--- a/port.c
+++ b/port.c
@@ -1347,12 +1347,14 @@
In a ptp unaware network (like the telecom profile for frequency sync
G.8265.1), both the RTD and the PDV can be substantially higher than in a ptp
aware network. To achieve more accurate measurements, the rate may need to be
configured higher to get more data and increase the chance of lucky
In a ptp unaware network (like the telecom profile for frequency sync
G.8265.1), both the RTD and the PDV can be substantially higher than in a ptp
aware network. To achieve more accurate measurements, the rate may need to be
configured higher to get more data and increase the chance of lucky
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:43:00AM +, Anders Selhammer wrote:
> How do I send a PATCH 0/X where I can explain the patches? An empty commit
> with just comments?
Here is how I do that:
* Exporting Patches
git format-patch \
--subject-prefix="PATCH" \
--output-directory
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:17:01PM +0100, Peter Schneider wrote:
> diff --git a/phc2sys.c b/phc2sys.c
> index 5c54055..c2f0d8e 100644
> --- a/phc2sys.c
> +++ b/phc2sys.c
> @@ -1286,6 +1286,7 @@ static void usage(char *progname)
> " -O [offset]slave-master time offset (0)\n"
>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:17:35PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> This seems like a reasonable thing to want... However, a bit more
> explanation on how the storage helps solve this problem, and possibly
> how you prevent the list from growing too large in the worst case
> might be good.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo