Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Convert to inclusive terminology, Part III

2021-01-19 Thread Keller, Jacob E
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Cochran > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 10:57 AM > To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Convert to inclusive terminology, Part > III > > * Part III > > - Mark the existing masterOnly option as

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] GET-only UDS port

2021-01-19 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:04:39PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > Or maybe add a separate Unix socket for GET-only operations? I think this is the way to go. People will soon want RDWR and RDONLY on the same system. Thanks, Richard ___

[Linuxptp-devel] GET-only UDS port

2021-01-19 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
In some environments there is a need to allow other applications to monitor ptp4l using the UDS port. They are restricted and should not be able to mess with ptp4l. Do you think it would make sense to implement a "uds_get_only" option to disable all non-GET commants? Or maybe add a separate Unix