On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:52:44PM -0800, Kishen Maloor wrote:
> CMLDS ptp4l process would be configured with
> transportSpecific/domain=0x2/0.
Question about the spec:
How on earth is this going to work?
I mean, if the link partner is not also using CMLDS, then it won't
reply because of the ma
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:52:44PM -0800, Kishen Maloor wrote:
> If serviceMeasurementValid=true, then we set both peer_portid_valid and
> p->nrate.ratio_valid to true so that port_capable() could evaluate to true.
Even simpler: include asCapable from the CMLDS Link Port in the TLV,
and just assi
I vote to fix also pmc (that is just a tool) output.
Also adding a new PUSH we break the pmc tools...
ciao
luigi
Il giorno ven 1 dic 2023 alle ore 09:03 Chwee-Lin Choong <
chwee.lin.cho...@intel.com> ha scritto:
> Add the computation for scaledLastGmFreqChange, as specified in
> IEEE 802.1AS-202
Add the computation for scaledLastGmFreqChange, as specified in
IEEE 802.1AS-2020, clause 11.4.4.3.9. This incorporates the
necessary logic to calculate scaledLastGmFreqChange and
appends the result to the follow-up TLV.
In addition, a naming error has been rectified from
scaledLastGmPhaseChange t
