> -Original Message-
> From: Petr Machata [mailto:pe...@mellanox.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 1:50 AM
> To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] forcing PASSIVE role for a
> port?
>
>
> Keller, Jaco
Keller, Jacob E writes:
>> > From: Sanjay Bhandari [mailto:san...@ziffusion.com]
>> > Is there a way to set a port in the PASSIVE role with ptp4l?
>> >
>> > Essentially, we want to listen in on the protocol, but not generate ANY
>> > protocol
>> messages ourselves. Nor do we want to set the
> -Original Message-
> From: Keller, Jacob E
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:42 PM
> To: 'Sanjay Bhandari'
> Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-users] forcing PASSIVE role for a port?
>
I forgot to reply to the list.
> > From: Sanjay Bhandari [mailto:san...@ziffusion.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday,
