Hooray! I was always annoyed by this output.
Thanks Miroslav,
Jake
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 14:23 +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> Negative path delay measurements are expected with E2E, the user doesn't
> need to know when that happens.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com>
> ---
> clock.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/clock.c b/clock.c
> index 9d5a937..063155b 100644
> --- a/clock.c
> +++ b/clock.c
> @@ -997,13 +997,13 @@ void clock_path_delay(struct clock *c, struct timespec
> req, struct timestamp rx,
> pd = tmv_div(pd, 2);
>
> if (pd < 0) {
> - pr_warning("negative path delay %10lld", pd);
> - pr_warning("path_delay = (t2 - t3) + (t4 - t1) - (c1 + c2 +
> c3)");
> - pr_warning("t2 - t3 = %+10lld", t2 - t3);
> - pr_warning("t4 - t1 = %+10lld", t4 - t1);
> - pr_warning("c1 %10lld", c1);
> - pr_warning("c2 %10lld", c2);
> - pr_warning("c3 %10lld", c3);
> + pr_debug("negative path delay %10lld", pd);
> + pr_debug("path_delay = (t2 - t3) + (t4 - t1) - (c1 + c2 + c3)");
> + pr_debug("t2 - t3 = %+10lld", t2 - t3);
> + pr_debug("t4 - t1 = %+10lld", t4 - t1);
> + pr_debug("c1 %10lld", c1);
> + pr_debug("c2 %10lld", c2);
> + pr_debug("c3 %10lld", c3);
> }
>
> c->path_delay = filter_sample(c->delay_filter, pd);
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
