Hello Jiri,
On 10 Dec 2014, at 09:10, Jiri Benc jb...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:04:56 +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote:
Yes, I was thinking it would allow to query if the driver supports this
feature and get/set current offsets.
I agree. That way, with correctly implemented
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:20:06AM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
actual addition/subtraction should be indeed done in ptp4l. It also
seems that ptp4l will need to listen for link change events.
Or this can be done by a helper program.
Thanks,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Jiri Benc [mailto:jb...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:11 AM
To: Delio Brignoli
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Time stamp asymmetry
correction
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:04:56 +0100
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:54 AM
To: Jiri Benc
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Time stamp asymmetry
correction
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:20
Hello Richard,
We implemented this correction in our driver using a private IOCTL and it would
have been nice to have used some standardised interface instead. However, I
think timestamp correction belongs in the PHY’s driver (or whatever is doing
the times-tamping). Data sheets report
Hi Richard,
On 08 Dec 2014, at 13:33, Richard Cochran richardcoch...@gmail.com wrote:
[…]
Because providing corrections in-kernel will be spotty at best, maybe
it better just to say, Linux drivers do *not* correct these delays. At
leas that makes things consistent. Otherwise end users will
