Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches

2023-11-28 Thread walfred tedeschi via Linuxptp-devel
Thank you very much Richard! Best regards, -Fred On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 6:23 AM Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi wrote: > > On 11.08.23 19:13, Richard Cochran wrote: > > > The CMLDS series will require careful review. My superficial review > >

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches

2023-11-15 Thread Richard Cochran
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi wrote: > On 11.08.23 19:13, Richard Cochran wrote: > > The CMLDS series will require careful review. My superficial review > > gave me the impression that the approach was too complex. > Do you have an indication on how it could be simplif

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches

2023-08-21 Thread Walfred Tedeschi via Linuxptp-devel
On 11.08.23 19:13, Richard Cochran wrote: HI Richard, Thanks a lot for the prompt answer! On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi via Linuxptp-devel wrote: Dear List, I kindly come to you to ask attention on the patches regarding the multi-domain implementation. I have lim

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches

2023-08-11 Thread Richard Cochran
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi via Linuxptp-devel wrote: > Dear List, > > I kindly come to you to ask attention on the patches regarding the > multi-domain implementation. I have limited time for reviewing patches, but I will eventually get to this series. The CMLDS

[Linuxptp-devel] CMLDS Patches

2023-08-11 Thread Walfred Tedeschi via Linuxptp-devel
Dear List, I kindly come to you to ask attention on the patches regarding the multi-domain implementation. Having a different role than my colleagues that are presenting the patch for review, I write you to bring a bit more motivation for the series. Multi-domain is an important part for I