> Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > The default precision of the SHM refclock in chrony is 1 microsecond,
> > it won't report jitter smaller than that. Add "precision 1e-9" to the
> > SHM line in your chrony.conf to fix that.
>
> Ah, that explains a lot. Will that fix the jitter computation?
Yes, the
Yo Miroslav!
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 09:31:58 +0100
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > > The default precision of the SHM refclock in chrony is 1
> > > microsecond, it won't report jitter smaller than that. Add
> > > "precision 1e-9" to the SHM line in your chrony.conf to fix th
Yo Richard!
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 08:47:00 +0100
Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:27:33PM -0800, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> > Any idea when they will hit the kernel mainline?
>
> Those patches are already in v4.0-rc1, and so they will definitely
> appear in the upcoming v4.0.
Cool
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:38:41AM -0800, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> > > Ah, that explains a lot. Will that fix the jitter computation?
> >
> > Yes, the +/- value in the chronyc sources output should be smaller
> > than 1 us now. It's mostly a cosmetic issue, it likely won't have any
> > noticeable
Yo Miroslav!
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:28:37 +0100
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:38:41AM -0800, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> > > > Ah, that explains a lot. Will that fix the jitter computation?
> > >
> > > Yes, the +/- value in the chronyc sources output should be smaller
> > > t
Hi,
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wants to follow you.
** Is drasko.drasko...@gmail.com you friend? **
If Yes please follow the link below:
http://invites.info-emailer.com/signup_e.html?fullname=&email=linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net&invitername=Drasko.draskovic&inviterid=17473118&useri
