Hello,
I am trying to have my device receive PTP from a master clock from one NIC and
output it through another NIC.
>From my understanding, I need to set boundary_clock_jbod high in the
>/etc/ptp4l.conf file. I tried running the command "ptp4l -p /dev/ptp4 -I eno1
>-ens801f1 -m" as well as
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:54:47PM +, Eric Decker wrote:
> I have a question related to the question below. If you use a
> boundary clock between gPTP and PTP, does the PHC have to be shared
> by both NICs?
Yes.
> If each NIC has an independent PHC I think phy2sys has to be used
> two
> > > Is it possible to force it to +0 like in the log of the
> > > first run above, the one that synchronizes?
>
> phc_ctl CLOCK_REALTIME freq 0
>
Hello, Miroslav, thank you very much.
BR.
___
Linuxptp-users mailing list
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:04:36AM -0300, Elder Costa wrote:
> > > ptp4l[484.261]: port 1 (enp3s0): new foreign master 0001c0.fffe.1a3cda-1
> > > ptp4l[488.262]: selected best master clock 0001c0.fffe.1a3cda
> > > ptp4l[488.262]: foreign master not using PTP timescale
> > > ptp4l[488.262]: port 1
I have a question related to the question below. If you use a boundary clock
between gPTP and PTP, does the PHC have to be shared by both NICs? What I mean
is the PHC is shared by both NICs while each NIC independently timestamps PTP
frames using the same PTP hardware clock.
If each NIC has
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Yeah, maybe I am a bit insane, but I find it fun hahaha
I will try what you suggested and report back if it worked. Maybe that's a
useful info for others as well.
Thanks,
Tamas
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Tuesday, May
> > ptp4l[484.261]: port 1 (enp3s0): new foreign master 0001c0.fffe.1a3cda-1
> > ptp4l[488.262]: selected best master clock 0001c0.fffe.1a3cda
> > ptp4l[488.262]: foreign master not using PTP timescale
> > ptp4l[488.262]: port 1 (enp3s0): LISTENING to UNCALIBRATED on RS_SLAVE
> > ptp4l[490.263]:
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 08:35:36AM +, Fueloep, Tamas via Linuxptp-users
wrote:
> Dear LinuxPTP mailing list participants,
>
> First of all, thank you very much for this amazing software - it
> really makes life easier and it is fun to use.
"fun to use?" hahaha that is new!
> I would
Dear LinuxPTP mailing list participants,
First of all, thank you very much for this amazing software - it really makes
life easier and it is fun to use.
I would have a question, because I can't get a grasp on something. I have a
setup, where multiple sensors are connected to the same
