Re: [Linuxptp-users] RMS Errors Growing

and the I219-LM rev. The working 219 chip reports rev 10 where the one that reports an error is rev 11. It seems like a driver would be the most likely problem. A quick look at the Intel website indicates that the e1000e drivers have changed to a kernel-only support model. Jason On 2023-06

Re: [Linuxptp-users] RMS Errors Growing

1968528885 freq +2399 +/- 0 delay -41795176 +/- 7986159 ptp4l[1070.939]: port 1 (eno1): SLAVE to UNCALIBRATED on SYNCHRONIZATION_FAULT Thanks, Jason On 2023-06-20 00:41, egg car wrote: Hi, Can you provide more info to reproduce the problem? E.g, your configuration, the network

[Linuxptp-users] RMS Errors Growing

sults. Any thoughts as to why the errors would continue to grow on the one interface and not the other? Thanks, Jason ___ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

[Linuxptp-users] PMC Response Time

e a way to reduce it? Thanks, Jason ___ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

Re: [Linuxptp-users] PMC Without Root

Hi Martin, This is exactly the info I needed to make the pmc call work! Thanks, Jason On 10/3/2022 9:52 AM, Martin Pecka wrote: Hi Jason, that's what the readonly UDS socket is for. With default configuration and PTP4L master branch, this is how you can query TIME_STATUS_NP without

[Linuxptp-users] PMC Without Root

27;ve seen some of the messages saying a patch was applied to PMC to allow running without elevated privileges.  Has this been implemented as of yet?  If so, how could I find the patch to build the project and configure it? Thanks, Jason ___ Linu

Re: [Linuxptp-users] [External]Re: Timemaster question with ptp4l and chrony

So it would seem that while that dummy entry stops the " port 1: received SYNC without timestamp" messages, it doesn't do much good afterwards. -Original Message- From: Miroslav Lichvar Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 01:09 To: Brooks, Jason Cc: linuxptp-users@lists

Re: [Linuxptp-users] [External]Re: running ptp4l under vmware

, November 5, 2021 05:53 To: Brooks, Jason ; linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [External]Re: [Linuxptp-users] running ptp4l under vmware CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know t

[Linuxptp-users] Timemaster question with ptp4l and chrony

1. And when using this system as an ntp source on another system it shows as a stratum 2 system. Shouldn't this be a stratum 1, given the ptp0 clock? 2. A lot of messages in /var/log/messages: * [44:enp0s25] port 1: received SYNC without timestamp Thank you for your time!

[Linuxptp-users] running ptp4l under vmware

0080ea.fffe.842b60 pmc -u -b 0 -f /etc/ptp4l.conf "GET current_data_set" sending: GET CURRENT_DATA_SET 005056.fffe.be1c0f-0 seq 0 RESPONSE MANAGEMENT CURRENT_DATA_SET stepsRemoved 1 offsetFromMaster 0.0 meanPathDelay0.0

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Enable Networking Time Jump

expected amount of time.   I do have the step adjust enabled at startup though. I wonder if there is any way to delay the start of ptp4l synchronization just long enough to allow all time information from the master to be received by the NIC? Thanks, Jason On 1/21/2021 5:40 PM, Jacob

[Linuxptp-users] Enable Networking Time Jump

nt at this point. A few moments later the correct time will be detected on its own and then ptp4l will slew to the correct time taking a few minutes or more. Is there a configuration setting that may handle this disable/enable network jump scenario? Thanks,