[Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Hello team, I had no issue with using software time stamping and also I am able to see the hardware timestamping support by building new kernel. But when I try to use the PHC, I see the PHC clock not being updated correctly. I see only the nSec bits being updated. Here are some of the tests I

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Hi Akash, At any given time, for a multi port switch, you can have only 1 port as Slave. And the other ports would become MASTER. This is a typical BC way of operation. Do you mean to have 3 ports on MASTER and one on SLAVE? If yes, this means, you want your device to be SLAVE to some master

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:24:36AM +0200, Akash Munirathinam wrote: > > Hey guys, > I really would like to know the answer to this question that's bugging me. > I have a NIC I350 with 4 ports. is it possible to make one port as Master > and the other ports as slave? or do i need to have another

[Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Hey guys, I really would like to know the answer to this question that's bugging me. I have a NIC I350 with 4 ports. is it possible to make one port as Master and the other ports as slave? or do i need to have another NIC which can act as a slave. Thanks in advance

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 04:33:11PM +0530, Gururaj Badiger wrote: > Hellow, > > Trying to make this query a bit simple: > > When *ClockClass* is set to 248, ptp4l, currently, goes into Ordinary > Clock(OC) mode. By that, it can switch to either Leader or Follower based > on availability of GM in

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Hellow, Trying to make this query a bit simple: When *ClockClass* is set to 248, ptp4l, currently, goes into Ordinary Clock(OC) mode. By that, it can switch to either Leader or Follower based on availability of GM in the domain. However, during some usecases, I would like to inhibit Slave state

[Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Hello, We have a need for a PTP instance to only be a master but still respond normally to the BMCA. This is used when we have two or more dedicated masters which use the BMCA to choose the GM. So the expected states once running are Master and Passive. We can get this if we set the *clockClass

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 02:12:38PM +0200, Akash Munirathinam wrote: > > Dear All, > My NIC is i350 which supports ptp. when i ran the command ethtool -T "my > interface" it doesn't show any parameters. it's quite strange. i have > attached an image for your reference. Do let me know if i am

[Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Dear All, My NIC is i350 which supports ptp. when i ran the command ethtool -T "my interface" it doesn't show any parameters. it's quite strange. i have attached an image for your reference. Do let me know if i am missing something and btw i even installed latest ethernet driver but in

[Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Hi all, I seem to run into increasing offsets constantly when running ptp4l or phc2sys in various combinations and with various options. New to PTP, I am trying to implement it on a Fedora Core 25 image (I know, rather old...) on a I210 network chip which supports hardware time stamping.

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:00:14PM +, Kelly, Marcus wrote: > I'd like to be able to submit bugs to linuxptp-users mailing lists. Yes, please do. That is what the list is for! Thanks, Richard ___ Linuxptp-users mailing list

[Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

I'd like to be able to submit bugs to linuxptp-users mailing lists. Thanks, Marcus Kelly Senior Software Engineer Astronics Custom Control Concepts Inc. 6020 S. 190th St. Kent, WA 98032 P: 206.575.0933 C: 206-910-0727 [cid:image001.jpg@01D519FD.41210140]

[Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

I've been following this post: https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/message/35980617/ But when I try the following command I obtain 2 interface with grandmaster role and I don't think this working well. ubuntu@tk-vm:~$ sudo ptp4l -i eth0 -i ens7 -S -m sudo: unable to resolve host

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

-Richard Cochran schrieb: - > > I still get the same error (Error 403, Read access required). > > Changed settings again. Does it work for you now? Yes, now it works fine (even without logging in to SourceForge). Thanks for fixing this! regards, Wolfgang

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 08:58 +0100, Wolfgang Wallner wrote: > 5) The PPS signal produced by the i210 seems to be unreliable > > I know that the right place to discuss i210 problems would be LMKL, I > just mention this here as I assume several of you might have > experience with this chip. > I

Re: [Linuxptp-users] (no subject)

Hallo Richard, Thank you for your answer ... As a matter of fact, when my colleague has ask me that i also said that it does not make sens :-) and we would need separate port and PHC :-) .. I clear is our situation : the purpose will be used on embedded software on train . the train has two