On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 08:31:26AM +, jawad ahmed saleemi wrote:
> It seems that we can have multiple entries for the transport type
> and the network address in the unicast master table. Should all
> these entries have the same transport type or they can be
> different.
No, the transport mus
To: jawad ahmed saleemi
Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] unicast ipv6 mode
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:40:09AM +, jawad ahmed saleemi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When try to run ptp4l with unicast ipv6 mode, I get this warning.
>
> ptp4l[517963.237]:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:40:09AM +, jawad ahmed saleemi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When try to run ptp4l with unicast ipv6 mode, I get this warning.
>
> ptp4l[517963.237]: port 1: unicast master transport mismatch
Your configuration file lacks:
[global]
network_transport UDPv6
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:40:09AM +, jawad ahmed saleemi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When try to run ptp4l with unicast ipv6 mode, I get this warning.
>
> ptp4l[517963.237]: port 1: unicast master transport mismatch
>
> I am compiling linuxptp 2.0 with this patch
Please try it with the latest linuxpt
Hi,
When try to run ptp4l with unicast ipv6 mode, I get this warning.
ptp4l[517963.237]: port 1: unicast master transport mismatch
I am compiling linuxptp 2.0 with this patch
diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
index c617510..9ad23e0 100644
--- a/util.c
+++ b/util.c
@@ -80,13 +80,17 @@ int addreq(enum
