owns e1000e, and
hopefully they can determine what needs to be fixed.
Thanks,
Jake
From: John Hubbard [mailto:jhubb...@noao.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:55 AM
To: Keller, Jacob E ; richardcoch...@gmail.com
Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Need help
On 03/22/2016 03:35 PM, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
Hi John,
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 13:45 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
On 03/16/2016 12:54 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:20:35AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
After changing the 'time_stamping' option in /etc/ptp4l.conf from
hardwar
Hi John,
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 13:45 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 12:54 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:20:35AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> > >
> > > After changing the 'time_stamping' option in /etc/ptp4l.conf from
> > > hardware to software and rest
On 03/16/2016 03:50 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:14:32PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> Apologies if this has already been asked and answered. I tried to look for
>> solutions to my problem in the mailing list archive, but when I click the
>> list archive link on the mail
e1000e.ko
[3] https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/15817
>
> William
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hubbard [mailto:jhubb...@noao.edu]
> Sent: 16 March 2016 16:39
> To: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Need help debugging failed clock synchr
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:45:00PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> If possible it would be really nice to get the HW time-stamping working on
> this system. I can move to another system if needed but getting this
> working would help me in the short term.
The best advice I know, would be to take the
On 03/16/2016 12:54 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:20:35AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> After changing the 'time_stamping' option in /etc/ptp4l.conf from
>> hardware to software and restarting ptp4l I now see much better
>> behavior.
> Yes, but probably you are disappointe
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:20:35AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> After changing the 'time_stamping' option in /etc/ptp4l.conf from
> hardware to software and restarting ptp4l I now see much better
> behavior.
Yes, but probably you are disappointed having to forego the HW
synchronization performan
: [Linuxptp-users] Need help debugging failed clock synchronization
On 03/16/2016 03:50 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:14:32PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> Apologies if this has already been asked and answered. I tried to
>> look for solutions to my problem
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:20:33AM +, Ledda William EXT wrote:
> Hello,
> I remember that there were some discussion on the “clock jumped
> forward or running faster than expected”. It could be a problem in
> the driver. AFAIK Intel i350 uses igb driver, while 82574L e1000.
The 82574 needs th
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:14:32PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> Apologies if this has already been asked and answered. I tried to look for
> solutions to my problem in the mailing list archive, but when I click the
> list archive link on the mailman page, I get a sourceforge page telling me
> Erro
Hello,
I remember that there were some discussion on the “clock jumped forward or
running faster than expected”. It could be a problem in the driver. AFAIK Intel
i350 uses igb driver, while 82574L e1000.
So… Which driver are you using (run “ethtool –i ” as root)? Have you
tried to run ptp4l wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
