> But in this case the channel strip and editor are part of the same
> application, so you can do your communication between them internally as you
> like, without having something to modify about the liblinuxsampler API. Or
> what am I missing?
>
Then it is I who is missing something, which is no
Es geschah am Monday 16 March 2009 als Luis Garrido schrieb:
> > The only inconsistency that currently exisists in this case is that the
> > virtual keyboard of the instrument editor still sends note on/off events
> > to
>
> Yup, that's what I meant.
>
> > Why would you want to connect the sampler
Es geschah am Monday 16 March 2009 als Luis Garrido schrieb:
> Hi!
>
> I have been investigating how to convert qgiged into an InstrumentEditor.
>
> The problem I see with the API right now is that IE is very limited in
> its functionality, probably as a consequence of its delicate
> interaction wi
I guess that my previous message amounts to:
Christian, have you any good idea about this problem and have the time
and inclination to implement it since I am thoroughly out of my depth
here?
Otherwise, thinking about it, the idea of an editor plugin which is
basically a dbus relay using pInstrum
Hi!
I have been investigating how to convert qgiged into an InstrumentEditor.
The problem I see with the API right now is that IE is very limited in
its functionality, probably as a consequence of its delicate
interaction with the sampler process.
However these limitations get in the way of a co
