Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Linuxsampler patch

2011-03-07 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:37:48 Christopher Cherrett wrote: > We were sending so much at LS so fast that the program changes were > becoming lost from the banks. > > By merging them we were able to keep them together long enough to > process the extreme amount of data being passed. You noticed a

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Linuxsampler patch

2011-03-07 Thread Christopher Cherrett
We were sending so much at LS so fast that the program changes were becoming lost from the banks. By merging them we were able to keep them together long enough to process the extreme amount of data being passed. With this patch we can now send every program change at the beginning of our song

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Linuxsampler patch

2011-03-07 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
Hi! I just reviewed your patch shortly for now. Minor question: Is there a reason that you merged the bank select number into a single variable (and doing bitshifting/masking later) instead of using separate parameters for program change und bank select? Except that, the patch looks OK. CU Ch