rosea.grammostola wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:21 PM, Christopher Cherrett wrote:
>> Nicola Pandini wrote:
>>> Il 12/03/2012 17:53, Christian Schoenebeck ha scritto:
Sure, but maybe a "MIDI instrument map" is a better way for you to achieve
such a flexible configuration. This feature allows
On 03/13/2012 04:54 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 11:00 AM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>> On Tuesday 13 March 2012 10:30:24 rosea.grammostola wrote:
>>> If I try to load multiple instances, one replaces the other
>>>
>>> cat Template1.lscp | nc localhost
>>>
>>> cat template2.
On 03/13/2012 11:00 AM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2012 10:30:24 rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> If I try to load multiple instances, one replaces the other
>>
>> cat Template1.lscp | nc localhost
>>
>> cat template2.lscp | nc localhost
>>
>> Template 2 replaces templa
Hm. I think it´s more helpful to start one linuxsampler on port and
another on port 8889. then you can do this:
cat Template1.lscp | nc localhost
cat template2.lscp | nc localhost 8889 <--- REMEMBER!
this should work. you can now connect each linuxsampler in jack or whatever you
want
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 10:30:24 rosea.grammostola wrote:
> If I try to load multiple instances, one replaces the other
>
> cat Template1.lscp | nc localhost
>
> cat template2.lscp | nc localhost
>
> Template 2 replaces template 1. They are not both loaded.
The sampler has no idea th
On 03/12/2012 03:42 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Sunday 11 March 2012 20:34:43 rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> Is it possible to run multiple instance of Linuxsampler or load multiple
>> lscp files (via commandline) into LinuxSampler?
>
> Both is possible. You can run multiple instances of lin
On 03/12/2012 11:21 PM, Christopher Cherrett wrote:
> Nicola Pandini wrote:
>> Il 12/03/2012 17:53, Christian Schoenebeck ha scritto:
>>> Sure, but maybe a "MIDI instrument map" is a better way for you to achieve
>>> such a flexible configuration. This feature allows you to define a MIDI
>>> progr
On 03/12/2012 05:53 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2012 18:14:10 rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply. There certainly are no stupid questions... I
>> thought, just ask, but it's actually possible!?!
>
> Yes, it is definitely possible to spawn multiple instances
