Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] EGs

2017-07-18 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 15:02:23 Andreas Persson wrote: > > after reviewing the code of the envelope generators, I noticed that I > > implemented the state machine of the EGs incorrectly years ago. The > > common > > behavior of EGs is that the attack, decay and decay hold phases

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] EGs

2017-07-18 Thread Andreas Persson
Aaron Laws wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Christian Schoenebeck > mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > after reviewing the code of the envelope generators, I noticed that I > implemented the state machine of the EGs incorrectly years ago. The >

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] EGs

2017-07-18 Thread Aaron Laws
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Christian Schoenebeck < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > after reviewing the code of the envelope generators, I noticed that I > implemented the state machine of the EGs incorrectly years ago. The common > behavior of EGs is that the attack,

[Linuxsampler-devel] EGs

2017-07-18 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
Hi everybody, after reviewing the code of the envelope generators, I noticed that I implemented the state machine of the EGs incorrectly years ago. The common behavior of EGs is that the attack, decay and decay hold phases are always played entirely according to their defined duration in the in