> Ok, I have reviewed your patch. There are several issues with your suggested
> patch, some which you already pointed out, but also you are doing things which
> are not real-time safe, and overall it simply looks like more changes than
> actually required.
I think that there's no need for a voice
On Freitag, 8. März 2019 05:45:38 CET Jacek Roszkowski wrote:
> This is my second approach to handling polyphony. I'm not submitting
> it into bugzilla, since I'm not sure if that's the way it should be
> resolved. It works for me, but it's not thoroughly tested even for my
> needs.
Ok, I have rev
