Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] wav2gig naming-convention

2021-08-29 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Sonntag, 29. August 2021 15:41:06 CEST Kolja Koch wrote: > > Regex patterns are doing the job, including use cases that go beyond > > your > > personal needs, and I don't have to maintain parsing code by myself. > > So the > > plan is to make this feature configurable by standard regex patterns

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] wav2gig naming-convention

2021-08-29 Thread Kolja Koch
> Because somebody would need to write *and* maintain all of that > software. Keep > in mind that almost all people stepping by here are usually just > saying > feature x doesn't work, please fix it. Or feature y is nice, but > please extend > it in this and that way. > True! > I understand t

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] wav2gig naming-convention

2021-08-29 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Samstag, 28. August 2021 20:23:34 CEST Kolja Koch wrote: > > wav2gig -a '(.*) - \d* - .* - .*.wav" \ > >-b '.* - (\d*) - .* - .*.wav" \ > >-c '.* - \d* - (.*) - .*.wav" \ > >-d '.* - \d* - .* - (.*).wav" > > It took me a moment to understand your prop

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] wav2gig naming-convention

2021-08-29 Thread Kolja Koch
I was thinking a little bit more about this. Maybe we should agree upon some kind of complexity-level we want to catch. For instance: The user might want to put samples into a gig-file, that have no common filename structure. We could write an interface to let him enter the required attributes (wi