we can now send every program change at the beginning
> of our song and not have LS drop most events.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Linuxsampler patch
> From: Christian Schoenebeck
> To: [email protected]
On Monday 07 March 2011 17:09:17 Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2011 15:37:48 Christopher Cherrett wrote:
> > We were sending so much at LS so fast that the program changes were
> > becoming lost from the banks.
> >
> > By merging them we were able to keep them together long eno
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:37:48 Christopher Cherrett wrote:
> We were sending so much at LS so fast that the program changes were
> becoming lost from the banks.
>
> By merging them we were able to keep them together long enough to
> process the extreme amount of data being passed.
You noticed a
song and not have LS drop most events.
Thanks!
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Linuxsampler patch
From: Christian Schoenebeck
To: [email protected]
Cc: Christopher Cherrett , linuxras
Date: 03/07/2011 07:14 AM
> Hi!
>
> I just
Hi!
I just reviewed your patch shortly for now. Minor question: Is there a reason
that you merged the bank select number into a single variable (and doing
bitshifting/masking later) instead of using separate parameters for program
change und bank select?
Except that, the patch looks OK.
CU
Ch
