Re: [linuxtools-dev] Welcome William Bourque as a new technology.linux-distros Committer

2010-01-19 Thread Francois Chouinard
At last :-) -- Francois ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Welcome William Bourque as a new technology.linux-distros Committer

2010-01-19 Thread portal on behalf of Francois Chouinard
technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for William Bourque. William Bourque is a new full Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. Welcome! __

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Charley Wang
- "Andrew Overholt" wrote: > P.S. Xavier, I don't know why I'm getting your HTML emails as raw > HTML > -- is it on my end? They display on Zimbra. And now for something completely differnt. I did appear to get one of Xavier's responses some 27 minutes before I got the message he res

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Xavier RAYNAUD [2010-01-19 11:23]: > gcc is covered by the CDT dependency. Do we really need the kernel > explicitly? > > > I guess that oprofile and ltt have some constraint on kernel, isn't it ? Well, our OProfile plugins have a dependency on the underlying oprofile tool so that probably c

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Andrew Overholt
> In this case, we also depends on linux kernel, gcc, ...  :) gcc is covered by the CDT dependency. Do we really need the kernel explicitly? These are what are referred to as "exempt pre-req" dependencies meaning because they're commonly available on users' systems, and as long as they're noted

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread John Arthorne
Just to clarify the purpose of this process, the CQ's exist mainly as a way of documenting dependencies. Filing a CQ allows them to be harvested and documented automatically by the IP log tool, which is far better than trying to do this by hand. The main thing you need to decide is whether it i

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Xavier RAYNAUD
Andrew Overholt a écrit : In this case, we also depends on linux kernel, gcc, ...  :) gcc is covered by the CDT dependency. Do we really need the kernel explicitly? I guess that oprofile and ltt have some constraint on kernel, isn't it ? Xavier

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi Xavier, * Xavier RAYNAUD [2010-01-19 02:47]: > Gprof and gcov depends on binutils (addr2line, c++filt, ...) > Do you need something about that ? I filed a CQ. Sorry, this should have been done when we went through this for the gprof contribution. I've CC'd you on the CQ, Xavier. Thanks, A

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Xavier RAYNAUD
Hum... In this case, we also depends on linux kernel, gcc, ...  :) Xavier Andrew Overholt a écrit : Hi Francois, We don't *distribute* that library, we only provide instructions on how to download, compile, install and configure it. Do we really need a CQ for that?

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi Francois, > We don't *distribute* that library, we only provide instructions on > how to download, compile, install and configure it. > > Do we really need a CQ for that? Yes, any and all dependencies need CQs, too. Andrew ___ linuxtools-dev mailin

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

2010-01-19 Thread Francois Chouinard
Hi, We don't *distribute* that library, we only provide instructions on how to download, compile, install and configure it. Do we really need a CQ for that? -- Francois ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/