Hi guys,
I'm wondering why the plug-in version of
org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.autotools.ui has not been bumped from 1.0.1 since
Dec 2010? I think it would be better to increase at least the service segment
of the plugin version because of the bug fixing, i.e. the changes introduced by
bug #3551
On 01/27/2012 01:50 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gerrit ([1], web-based code review system) is almost ready for usage by
> all eclipse.org projects [2].
>
> How do Linux Tools contributors and committers feel about using it for
> Linux Tools?
I've heard good things about, and it's someth
On 01/27/2012 07:50 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Hi,
Gerrit ([1], web-based code review system) is almost ready for usage by
all eclipse.org projects [2].
How do Linux Tools contributors and committers feel about using it for
Linux Tools?
I have never used Gerrit, but I like to work with code r
> >> I was thinking in a release for March 26th, two months from now and
> >> between the 0.9 and 1.0 releases.
I forgot that it's probably a good idea to discuss this planned release
with technology-...@eclipse.org since it'll be crunch time for them and
the Eclipse legal team and we'll have to g
> How do Linux Tools contributors and committers feel about using it
> for
> Linux Tools?
I've used Gerrit in the past to contribute some code to jgit/egit from
the perspective of a non-committer proposing patches. There even appears
to be a Mylyn connector for it [1].
+1 to using Gerrit.
[1] ht
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 18:00 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Yes, one can always give their own code a +2 for emergency fixes. But
> it's sort of in the spirit of code review to have others review all
> changes as it spreads knowledge and generally improves code :)
What's more, commiters should h
