[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is still unstable: linuxtools-master #832

See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #831

See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is back to stable : linuxtools-master #830

See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is still unstable: linuxtools-master #829

See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #828

See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Changing jobs

You deserve the honor to tag and upload Linux Tools 1.0 ! So I volunteer you for these 2 things :) Alex - Original Message - > From: "Andrew Overholt" > To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:09:18 AM > Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Changing jobs > > Hi, > > After

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Changing jobs

We will all miss you. Thanks for all the good work you did for Linux Tools! -Original Message- From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Overholt Sent: April-26-12 5:09 PM To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org Subject: [linuxtools-d

[linuxtools-dev] Changing jobs

Hi, After much thought, I've made the incredibly difficult decision to leave Red Hat. My last day here will be Monday April 30th and my new job will not be related to Eclipse or Linux Tools. I would like to stress that this move is in no way a reflection on Eclipse or Red Hat. Things are in goo

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

On 04/26/2012 04:33 PM, Daniel HB wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:24 -0300, Rafael M Teixeira wrote: Some plugins (most of Valgrind tools, gprof and gcov, for example) rely on the original binary to display info in the view, such as line numbers and function names. This means we would have to w

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:24 -0300, Rafael M Teixeira wrote: > > Some plugins (most of Valgrind tools, gprof and gcov, for example) > rely > on the original binary to display info in the view, such as line > numbers > and function names. This means we would have to whether save a > snapshot > of

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

On 04/24/2012 12:40 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote: On 04/24/2012 12:21 PM, Daniel HB wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: * Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: I've been asked multiple times about post-mo

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Remote support for RPM plugin

I'll review shortly. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Rodrigo Fraxino Araujo wrote: > Hi, > > I've submitted a patch that intends to add support to create and export > remote rpm packages. > It is included in > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=377671 > > Regards, > Rodrigo. > > _

[linuxtools-dev] Remote support for RPM plugin

Hi, I've submitted a patch that intends to add support to create and export remote rpm packages. It is included in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=377671 Regards, Rodrigo. ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https:/