Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gcov and Gprof plugins

2012-06-18 Thread Jeff Johnston
On 06/18/2012 05:39 PM, Renato Stoffalette Joao wrote: On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 17:09 -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: Gprof and gcov get their data just by running the executable that has been compiled and linked with special compiler options. Valgrind and Oprofile have executables that must run (Valg

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gcov and Gprof plugins

2012-06-18 Thread Renato Stoffalette Joao
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 17:09 -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Gprof and gcov get their data just by running the executable that has > been compiled and linked with special compiler options. > > Valgrind and Oprofile have executables that must run (Valgind itself and > opcontrol). > Ok, I understand

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gcov and Gprof plugins

2012-06-18 Thread Jeff Johnston
Gprof and gcov get their data just by running the executable that has been compiled and linked with special compiler options. Valgrind and Oprofile have executables that must run (Valgind itself and opcontrol). The plug-ins were written by separate developers so I would call the difference a pro

[linuxtools-dev] Remote environment binutils

2012-06-18 Thread Renato Stoffalette Joao
Hi guys I cannot find any information on remote environment binutils ? Is there an extension point, eclipse plugin or any implementation for that? Has it ever come to discussion ? Thank you Renato ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@e

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is back to normal : linuxtools-juno #430

2012-06-18 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Gcov and Gprof plugins

2012-06-18 Thread Renato Stoffalette Joao
Hi guys. I have been trying to work on a remote implementation for Gcov and Gprof plugins but I have some doubts I'd like to clarify. Why do Gprof and Gcov plugins parse the (gmon.out,*.gcda,*.gcno) files directly instead of running a "Process" like Valgrind and Oprofile do, for instance ? Are the

[linuxtools-dev] Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-juno #429

2012-06-18 Thread hudsonbuild
See Changes: [Jeff Johnston] Change tcf-site to include real path instead of link path. -- [...truncated 12212 lines...] 11 KB 11 KB 12 KB 12 KB 13 KB 13 KB 14 KB 14 K

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is back to normal : linuxtools-master #945

2012-06-18 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev