[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is back to normal : linuxtools-master #950

2012-06-19 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #949

2012-06-19 Thread hudsonbuild
See Changes: [Roland Grunberg] Partially revert 23a84d3 to ensure support of older API. [Alexandre Montplaisir] tmf: Clean up the ctfAdaptor unit tests [Roland Grunberg] Initial contribution of Profiling Unification work. --

Re: [linuxtools-dev] TMF: thanks a lot

2012-06-19 Thread Patrick Tasse
Hi Xavier, Thanks for the thanks, some comments below: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:11 AM, xraynaud wrote: > o TimeGraphViewer: > It's not easy for the developer to add a mouse listener on the time > graph. > (My users want to interact with ITimeEvent and ITimeGraphEntry objects). > My intenti

Re: [linuxtools-dev] TMF: thanks a lot

2012-06-19 Thread Francois Chouinard
Hello Xavier, Thanks for the comments. o Support on Indigo. > On one side, I'm stuck on eclipse Indigo for various reasons. > On the other side, I would like to use TMF from linuxtools-1.0. > Is it planned to have an official backport of TMF for indigo ? > > TMF is supposed to work out of the

[linuxtools-dev] TMF: thanks a lot

2012-06-19 Thread xraynaud
Hi, I've developed, on top of TMF framework, a tool to visualize traces on a parallel device. I would like to thank a lot TMF developers for this great framework. It was a real pleasure to use it. After this experience, I've a few questions and proposals: o Support on Indigo. On one side, I'm

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gcov and Gprof plugins

2012-06-19 Thread xraynaud
Hi, You're right, it makes sense. It was not the way taken at the origin, but it can be changed. Note that at the origin , this plugin was developed in STMicroelectronics for a cross-development environment. Gprof and gcov plugins depends on cross-binutils to read the binary file. An extension po