Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

On 13-02-12 04:45 PM, François Rajotte wrote: > > I believe the main concern was if we want the information about _many_ > processes at a given timestamp. > If only one query is necessary (Michel's proposal), then we are sure > to have all the information in one query. (constant in the number of >

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir < alexmon...@voxpopuli.im> wrote: > > >> this method only requires a single "attribute" to store the cumulative > time and whether or not the process is in an active interval. Its value is > changed at schedule in and at schedule out. However,

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

> If you fall on a "real" interval, there is no additional queries. If > you fall on a null interval, you have to do one additional query, to get the > previous interval. If you want to query a range, you have to do 2 > queries already, by definition. So in the worst case, you end up doing 4 > que

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

>> this method only requires a single "attribute" to store the cumulative time >> and whether or not the process is in an active interval. Its value is >> changed at schedule in and at schedule out. However, you need to do >> additional queries. For instance, if you want to show the CPU usage p

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

On 13-02-12 08:18 AM, Michel Dagenais wrote: >> - If you fall on a "real" interval, you know you are in a time where the >> process was active on the CPU. You will need to do the interpolation >> between the value (which represents the cumulative amount at the >> start of the interval), the length

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to stable : linuxtools-master #1271

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng tests breaking nightlies/sonar

> But as mentioned, we'll just disable them for now, until the problem > at > Eclipse is fixed. I've taken Alexandre's patch against maven-antrun-plugin and modified it to work with the build. I'm not sure why it wasn't able to resolve ant-contrib:ant-contrib but have worked around that. The buil

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng tests breaking nightlies/sonar

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir < alexmon...@voxpopuli.im> wrote: > Hi Aleksandar, > > The problem seems to be on Eclipse's side. The Jubula team has responded > to the bug saying it affects them too: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=400473 > > We have no idea

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng tests breaking nightlies/sonar

Hi Aleksandar, The problem seems to be on Eclipse's side. The Jubula team has responded to the bug saying it affects them too: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=400473 We have no idea how long that might take to fix, so we'll disable the downloading (and the tests that depend on it) i

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

> - If you fall on a "real" interval, you know you are in a time where the > process was active on the CPU. You will need to do the interpolation > between the value (which represents the cumulative amount at the > start of the interval), the length of the interval, and the current > position in t

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng tests breaking nightlies/sonar

On a second thought - offline builds is heavy used in many places so I would like Linux Tools to not try fetching it's sources during build. Note that maven/p2 reqs are not in the same category as they can easily be provided by nexus installation. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team -