[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Andrew Ferrazzutti has been approved by the PMC

2013-11-21 Thread portal on behalf of portal-noreply
tools.linuxtools Committers, This automatically generated message marks the PMC's approval of the vote for Andrew Ferrazzutti's full Committer status on the tools.linuxtools project. The next step is for the project lead to return to the portal and fill in the VCS package and employer information f

[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Andrew Ferrazzutti has concluded successfully

2013-11-21 Thread portal on behalf of
tools.linuxtools Committers, This automatically generated message marks the successful completion of voting for Andrew Ferrazzutti to receive full Committer status on the tools.linuxtools project. The next step is for the PMC to approve this vote, followed by the EMO processing the paperwork and pr

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 13-11-21 06:54 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: > On 13-11-21 06:42 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: >> A verification build can be retriggered after failure if it just hiccups >> unexpectedly (e.g. Eclipse.org issue). If one follows the build started >> message URL and logs in, the build can be retri

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 13-11-21 06:42 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > I am a bit leery of this. A test failure should not occur and I'm not > sure everyone will be diligent in tracking their errors. IMO, tests > that are randomly failing elsewhere should be disabled and fixed by > whoever owns them (i.e. if some non-rela

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Johnston
I am a bit leery of this. A test failure should not occur and I'm not sure everyone will be diligent in tracking their errors. IMO, tests that are randomly failing elsewhere should be disabled and fixed by whoever owns them (i.e. if some non-related test keeps failing, push a patch to disable it

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
Hi all, What would you think of making the Hudson-Gerrit plugin (a.k.a. Hudson CI) giving "-1 Code Review" on Gerrit, instead of the current "-1 Verified"? The difference is that a committer can override a -1 CR when giving it a +2, which allows pushing the patch anyway. When "-1 Verified" is give

[linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 2.2 Release Preparations

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Johnston
As the release is coming up fast, I would like to request that everybody make sure bugs are open for all features that are meant to be part of 2.2 and that the bugs target 2.2. Contributions from non-committers is frozen after tomorrow. I expect that Andrew will be accepted as a committer so h

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 2.2 release dates

2013-11-21 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message - > From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" > To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:57:43 PM > Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 2.2 release dates > > As no one objected the new release date is December 20th, as changed in > portal.