[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #1812

2014-02-04 Thread hudsonbuild
See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org h

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Kepler SR2 Preparations

2014-02-04 Thread Jeff Johnston
I was going to change the parent poms, but if you are in the middle of a mass change, please feel free to continue. Yes, please bump the changed plugins/features for a point release (no major or minor release number changes, just the point qualifier). -- Jeff J. - Original Message - F

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Kepler SR2 Preparations

2014-02-04 Thread Doug Schaefer
I've been wondering that lately. Does it matter what the parent pom version‎ is? It's such a pain to change. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. Original Message From: Marc-André Laperle Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 1:32 PM To: Linux Tools developer discussions Reply

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Kepler SR2 Preparations

2014-02-04 Thread Marc-André Laperle
OK, just to make sure we're on the same page, here's what I'm going to do: - Bump the Linux Tools parent pom to 2.2.1 (because some of its children contain bug fixes) Bump the plugins and features that contain changes: - org.eclipse.linuxtools.oprofile.ui - org.eclipse.linuxtools.oprofile.ui.tests

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Kepler SR2 Preparations

2014-02-04 Thread Jeff Johnston
Yes, if you have made fixes for 2.2.1, please go ahead and bump the version numbers from 2.2 to 2.2.1 in the stable-2.2 branch. Make sure the same plug-ins/features on master are not behind (i.e. are 2.2.1 or greater). -- Jeff J. - Original Message - From: "Marc-André Laperle" To: "Lin

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Kepler SR2 Preparations

2014-02-04 Thread Marc-André Laperle
Hi Jeff, Should we bump the versions to 2.2.1? I can go ahead and do that if you want. I think it's a bit less confusing to the user than just relying on the build qualifier. Marc-Andre On 14-01-27 04:26 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Just to let people know that Kepler SR2 RC1 was aggregated last w

Re: [linuxtools-dev] oprofile plug-in does not work for non-default unit masks

2014-02-04 Thread Rodrigo Fraxino Araujo
Fix reviewed in https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/21494/ Bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=427280 On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:12:35 -0600 Maynard Johnson wrote: > Hi, again, > I'm seeing a problem involving unit masks on a RHEL 6.4/Sandybridge, > using the OProfile plug-in on Kepler (vers

[linuxtools-dev] TMF: Bookmarks, Experiments and Traces

2014-02-04 Thread Xavier Raynaud
Hi, I've some question about the way bookmarks are managed in TMF. When playing with an experiment, a special resource is created to store bookmarks (TmfExperimentElement.createBookmarksFile()). And the same with a single trace (TmfTraceElement.createBookmarksFile()). However: 1) TmfExperimen