Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools M7 requirements and release planning

2014-05-01 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
If no one propose something to improve the last year one. I would say repeat it. For reference: https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/linuxtools-dev/msg02631.html https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/linuxtools-dev/msg02671.html Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message

[linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools M7 requirements and release planning

2014-05-01 Thread Marc-André Laperle
Hi, I was wondering what does M7 mean for the Linux Tools. Feature freeze? API freeze? What about the next milestones? Thank you, Marc-André ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Failing SWTBot test on Hudson

2014-05-01 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
Please do so. If we can get more stable swtbot I would be more than happy. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message - > From: "Marc-André Laperle" > To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" > Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 5:55:53 PM > Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Failing SWT

[linuxtools-dev] Failing SWTBot test on Hudson

2014-05-01 Thread Marc-André Laperle
Hello, I have spent some time investigating one of our SWTBot tests failing on eclipse.org's Hudson (see change 25455 [1]). Strangely, after opening one of the dialogs, SWTBot can't find anything and nothing is in focus. However, I have seen in the SWTBot wiki [2] that metacity is the recommended