[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to stable : master-java8 #176

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org To chan

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-luna #41

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org To ch

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to stable : linuxtools-master #2081

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org T

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy

- Original Message - > From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" > To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:36:29 PM > Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jeff Johnston" > > To: "Linux Tools

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy

- Original Message - > From: "Jeff Johnston" > To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:28:42 PM > Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy > > So do you mean all features or just features with changes to their plugins? All f

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy

My misunderstanding. Thanks for clarifying. - Original Message - From: "Doug Schaefer" To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 3:18:20 PM Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy Actually CDT only bumps up feature versions to ma

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy

So do you mean all features or just features with changes to their plugins? I wanted to change the plug-ins as well to make it easier to look at an @since tag and know when the change occurred, but I guess git annotation will reveal this just the same. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - > F

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy

Having features being bumped to the release version and plugins following API rules sounds like the correct thing to do as that way it's clear what you install from update sites. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message - > From: "Doug Schaefer" > To: "Linux Tools de

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy

Actually CDT only bumps up feature versions to match. Plug-ins follow API rules. On 2014-09-10, 3:12 PM, "Jeff Johnston" wrote: >There a few different policies for bumping versions for features/plugins. > >We don't have a hard-set policy, but some of us are bumping up features to >the Linux Tool

[linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy

There a few different policies for bumping versions for features/plugins. We don't have a hard-set policy, but some of us are bumping up features to the Linux Tools release number and others are bumping up a plugin/feature by one depending on whether we are doing a major release, minor release, o

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #2080

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org T

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build became unstable: master-java8 #174

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org To chan

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 3.1 RC3 re-spin?

Great, thank you Jeff! From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of Jeff Johnston [jjohn...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2014 11:03 AM To: Linux Tools developer discussions Subject: Re: [linuxtools

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 3.1 RC3 re-spin?

I have pushed an RC3a aggregation and posted to the Cross Project list to request it be included if possible. We need to be careful about any fixes made to RC4 as there are no more builds after that. If your changes are important and well tested, then it might be possible to get them in. Otherwi

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 3.1 RC3 re-spin?

Hi, In case of a respin RC3 not happen, I'd like to propose a release 3.1.1 with fixes only. It's likely I will have more fixes coming in a couple days that shouldn't be possible to push into 3.1. For example: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/33104/ - Wainer On 09/10/2014 02:17 AM, Marc-Andr