Hello,
While doing some tests with Helgrind I saw that the newest Helgrind
version comes with more options than the current Helgrind plug-in
supports today. I haven't noticed it before because the older options
still exists and running Helgrind does not trigger any errors. I need to
check, but it'
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:24 -0300, Rafael M Teixeira wrote:
>
> Some plugins (most of Valgrind tools, gprof and gcov, for example)
> rely
> on the original binary to display info in the view, such as line
> numbers
> and function names. This means we would have to whether save a
> snapshot
> of
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > > > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > > > >LinuxTools.
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > >LinuxTools.
> >
> > I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
>
> I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just
> wasn't part of the
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:33 +0200, Xavier Raynaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a question about valgrind integration.
> I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem. (The best will be
> to open them with a simple double-click).
>
> Is it currently possible ?
I don't think so. In the way Valgri
Hi,
Bumping the discussion. Do we have anyone working in making
gprof/gcov/massif use SWTchart?
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 22:32 +0100, xraynaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't know SWTChart, but it looks a good idea.
> If this proposal is accepted, I think we should do the same for gcov &
> gprof - and p
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:09 -0200, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 10:47 AM, Otávio Pontes wrote:
> > On 01/19/2012 10:16 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> From: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"
> >>> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> >>
Hey Corey!
I think it's a good idea but I don't think, unfortunately, that is
simple to implement in the case of the Oprofile plugin. It uses a script
to add an entry in the sudoers (Suse) or add a security wrapper for
consolehelper (RHEL). After that it executes the tool using a symbolic
link loc
I'm currently trying to make the Oprofile plugin work on a Power6
machine. I've come to this mailing list a couple weeks ago with a
complaint that generated a bug
( https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=336977 ) which we
managed to solve - the XML error was a bogus character generated on th
:08 -0200, danie...@br.ibm.com wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:35 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:04 -0200, Daniel HB wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:21 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:2
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:35 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:04 -0200, Daniel HB wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:21 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:24 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> > > > Severin Gehwolf wrote
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:21 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:24 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> > Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> > >> Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt w
12 matches
Mail list logo