[linuxtools-dev] Valgrind versions - support only newest?

2012-07-03 Thread Daniel HB
Hello, While doing some tests with Helgrind I saw that the newest Helgrind version comes with more options than the current Helgrind plug-in supports today. I haven't noticed it before because the older options still exists and running Helgrind does not trigger any errors. I need to check, but it'

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

2012-04-26 Thread Daniel HB
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:24 -0300, Rafael M Teixeira wrote: > > Some plugins (most of Valgrind tools, gprof and gcov, for example) > rely > on the original binary to display info in the view, such as line > numbers > and function names. This means we would have to whether save a > snapshot > of

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

2012-04-24 Thread Daniel HB
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]: > > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the > > > > >LinuxTools.

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

2012-04-24 Thread Daniel HB
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the > > >LinuxTools. > > > > I personaly think that it's useful in all cases. > > I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just > wasn't part of the

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

2012-04-24 Thread Daniel HB
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:33 +0200, Xavier Raynaud wrote: > Hi, > > I've a question about valgrind integration. > I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem. (The best will be > to open them with a simple double-click). > > Is it currently possible ? I don't think so. In the way Valgri

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Valgrind Massif plugin switch from BIRT to SWTChart

2012-02-22 Thread Daniel HB
Hi, Bumping the discussion. Do we have anyone working in making gprof/gcov/massif use SWTchart? On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 22:32 +0100, xraynaud wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't know SWTChart, but it looks a good idea. > If this proposal is accepted, I think we should do the same for gcov & > gprof - and p

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 0.9.1 Build

2012-01-19 Thread Daniel HB
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:09 -0200, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote: > On 01/19/2012 10:47 AM, Otávio Pontes wrote: > > On 01/19/2012 10:16 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > >> > >> > >> - Original Message - > >>> From: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" > >>> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org > >>

Re: [linuxtools-dev] The location of Linux Tools Project executables

2011-06-21 Thread Daniel HB
Hey Corey! I think it's a good idea but I don't think, unfortunately, that is simple to implement in the case of the Oprofile plugin. It uses a script to add an entry in the sudoers (Suse) or add a security wrapper for consolehelper (RHEL). After that it executes the tool using a symbolic link loc

[linuxtools-dev] Oprofile plugin issues with Power processors

2011-02-25 Thread Daniel HB
I'm currently trying to make the Oprofile plugin work on a Power6 machine. I've come to this mailing list a couple weeks ago with a complaint that generated a bug ( https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=336977 ) which we managed to solve - the XML error was a bogus character generated on th

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Opxml question

2011-02-11 Thread Daniel HB
:08 -0200, danie...@br.ibm.com wrote: > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:35 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:04 -0200, Daniel HB wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:21 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:2

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Opxml question

2011-02-11 Thread Daniel HB
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:35 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:04 -0200, Daniel HB wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:21 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:24 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote: > > > > Severin Gehwolf wrote

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Opxml question

2011-02-11 Thread Daniel HB
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:21 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:24 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote: > > Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote: > > >> Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > >>> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt w