On 12-06-29 02:59 AM, akurtakov wrote:
>> So no API break in 'master' before SR2 (including November LT v2.0)? Fine
>> with me.
> The proposal for November Linux Tools 2.0 was in order to make it
> easier to get your API breaking things in. If we manage to not break
> the API the release should be
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Francois Chouinard
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:38 PM, akurtakov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Projects should try hard to not break API - the easiest way is to
>> export less but going the ISomething2 might be an option too.
>> We want to provide our work to customers
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:38 PM, akurtakov wrote:
>
> Projects should try hard to not break API - the easiest way is to
> export less but going the ISomething2 might be an option too.
> We want to provide our work to customers faster, we want to ship in
> maintenance releases that's why breaking
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Francois Chouinard
wrote:
>>
>> When a project goes out of incubation everything in it goes out of
>> incubation there is no middle ground. Once a project is out of incubation it
>> can setup its own incubator but it would be pretty weird to move lttng back
>> to i
> A question for Alex: Can we bump the LT major number in a Juno maintenance
> releases?
It would be largely frowned upon.
Andrew
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
>
> When a project goes out of incubation everything in it goes out of
> incubation there is no middle ground. Once a project is out of incubation
> it can setup its own incubator but it would be pretty weird to move lttng
> back to incubation and even if we do that it would have to be kept api
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexandre Montplaisir"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" ,
> "akurtakov"
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:24:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] API breaks and branching strategy
>
> On 12-
On 06/28/2012 04:54 PM, akurtakov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir
wrote:
Hello Linux Toolers,
We of the LTTng group already have some changes in the pipeline that
will break our 1.0 API. If I understood correctly, the 1.1, 1.2, etc.
releases (if applicable) will
On 12-06-28 03:54 PM, akurtakov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir
> wrote:
>> Hello Linux Toolers,
>>
>> We of the LTTng group already have some changes in the pipeline that
>> will break our 1.0 API. If I understood correctly, the 1.1, 1.2, etc.
>> releases (if appl
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir
wrote:
> Hello Linux Toolers,
>
> We of the LTTng group already have some changes in the pipeline that
> will break our 1.0 API. If I understood correctly, the 1.1, 1.2, etc.
> releases (if applicable) will be based off the current stable-1.0
Hello Linux Toolers,
We of the LTTng group already have some changes in the pipeline that
will break our 1.0 API. If I understood correctly, the 1.1, 1.2, etc.
releases (if applicable) will be based off the current stable-1.0
branch, not the master. Does this mean we can switch our plugins to
2.0.
11 matches
Mail list logo
