On 07/04/2012 02:36 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
wrote:
On 07/04/2012 12:57 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
What's wrong with RESOLVED -> VERIFIED? Would you rather they were in
the CLOSED state?
Yes, I thought they were to be in
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2012 12:57 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>
>> What's wrong with RESOLVED -> VERIFIED? Would you rather they were in
>> the CLOSED state?
>
>
> Yes, I thought they were to be in CLOSED state.
It's up to each proj
On 07/04/2012 12:57 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
What's wrong with RESOLVED -> VERIFIED? Would you rather they were in
the CLOSED state?
Yes, I thought they were to be in CLOSED state.
Andrew
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
wrote:
Hi all,
There are 46 bugzil
What's wrong with RESOLVED -> VERIFIED? Would you rather they were in
the CLOSED state?
Andrew
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are 46 bugzillas in resolved/verified status which target milestone
> was '1.0'. What if we make a task force to
Hi all,
There are 46 bugzillas in resolved/verified status which target
milestone was '1.0'. What if we make a task force to verify and close
them to reduce the backlog?
Query:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED;bug_status=VERIFIED;classification=Technology;list_id=
