Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 13-11-21 06:54 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: > On 13-11-21 06:42 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: >> A verification build can be retriggered after failure if it just hiccups >> unexpectedly (e.g. Eclipse.org issue). If one follows the build started >> message URL and logs in, the build can be retri

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
anually (and having to do trivial changes to it for Gerrit to take it, etc.). Thanks, Alexandre > > -- Jeff J. > > - Original Message - > From: "Alexandre Montplaisir" > To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 6:

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Johnston
eff J. - Original Message - From: "Alexandre Montplaisir" To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 6:01:45 PM Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches Hi all, What would you think of making the Hudson-Gerrit plugin

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson CI NAK'ing patches

2013-11-21 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
Hi all, What would you think of making the Hudson-Gerrit plugin (a.k.a. Hudson CI) giving "-1 Code Review" on Gerrit, instead of the current "-1 Verified"? The difference is that a committer can override a -1 CR when giving it a +2, which allows pushing the patch anyway. When "-1 Verified" is give