> I'll just take this opportunity to point out once more that PTP
> provides a complete framework for integrating external performance
> tools with Eclipse without the need to write plugin code. The
> framework includes the ability to specify a user interface in the
> profiling launch configuration
On 10/09/2012 04:58 PM, Wainer Moschetta wrote:
On 10/09/2012 05:51 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
On 10/09/2012 04:33 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
How to define which profile tool to use with this unified launch?
Because right now linuxtools
have Valgrind (and all the subtools), Oprofile, Perf
M
I'll just take this opportunity to point out once more that PTP provides a
complete framework for integrating external performance tools with Eclipse
without the need to write plugin code. The framework includes the ability to
specify a user interface in the profiling launch configuration and to
On 10/09/2012 04:56 PM, Wainer Moschetta wrote:
On 10/09/2012 05:09 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
On 10/09/2012 02:47 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
Hi all,
I saw a message from Jeff into CDT mailing list regarding unifying
linuxtools launchers. If I understood correctly that unification is
emphasized
On 10/09/2012 05:51 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
On 10/09/2012 04:33 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
How to define which profile tool to use with this unified launch?
Because right now linuxtools
have Valgrind (and all the subtools), Oprofile, Perf
Maybe running all the available tools and providin
On 10/09/2012 05:09 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
On 10/09/2012 02:47 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
Hi all,
I saw a message from Jeff into CDT mailing list regarding unifying
linuxtools launchers. If I understood correctly that unification is
emphasized for local c/c+ although we now have remote capabi
On 10/09/2012 04:33 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
How to define which profile tool to use with this unified launch?
Because right now linuxtools
have Valgrind (and all the subtools), Oprofile, Perf
Maybe running all the available tools and providing all the results
in a "Profile" perspective?
> How to define which profile tool to use with this unified launch?
> Because right now linuxtools
> have Valgrind (and all the subtools), Oprofile, Perf
>
> Maybe running all the available tools and providing all the results
> in a "Profile" perspective?
>
> Sorry to jump in the middle of t
PM
Subject:
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linuxtools unified launch
Sent by:
linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
On 10/09/2012 02:47 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I saw a message from Jeff into CDT mailing list regarding unifying
>> linuxtools launchers. If I unders
On 10/09/2012 02:47 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
Hi all,
I saw a message from Jeff into CDT mailing list regarding unifying
linuxtools launchers. If I understood correctly that unification is
emphasized for local c/c+ although we now have remote capabilities in
almost all plug-ins and, thus, I got
> Hi all,
>
> I saw a message from Jeff into CDT mailing list regarding unifying
> linuxtools launchers. If I understood correctly that unification is
> emphasized for local c/c+ although we now have remote capabilities in
> almost all plug-ins and, thus, I got a bit worried.
I think the remote t
Hi all,
I saw a message from Jeff into CDT mailing list regarding unifying
linuxtools launchers. If I understood correctly that unification is
emphasized for local c/c+ although we now have remote capabilities in
almost all plug-ins and, thus, I got a bit worried.
Indeed, it seems a great re
12 matches
Mail list logo
