alf of Aleksandar Kurtakov
>[akurt...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Thursday, 05 December 2013 1:32 PM
>To: Linux Tools developer discussions
>Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Luna release and Java 7
>
>As we already build with Java 7, I propose to start using 1.7 in tests
>unconditionally aka
ed.
Marc-Andre
From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org]
on behalf of Aleksandar Kurtakov [akurt...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, 05 December 2013 1:32 PM
To: Linux Tools developer discussions
Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Luna release and Java 7
As we already build
v"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:40:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Luna release and Java 7
>
> This plan is for Kepler I don't think it's update for Luna yet. Also this
> plan is for Ecli
ols-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:09:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Luna release and Java 7
>
> I don't know yet Eclipse Luna has been tested mostly on Java 6:
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse#target_
I don't know yet Eclipse Luna has been tested mostly on Java 6:
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse#target_environments
Unless that plan is outdated
Cheers,
Wainer
On 11/25/2013 07:15 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
+1!
Java 6 was EOL'ed for over 6 mo
+1!
Java 6 was EOL'ed for over 6 months already, would make sense to move to
7, especially if it's to follow suit with CDT. I can't wait to use some
of the nice things it comes with (switch on strings, try-with-resources,
etc.)
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 13-11-25 03:33 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Hi everyone,
I see few reviews on gerrit about bringing back support for Java 6. So it's
time to start discussing that:
Do we need to support Java 6 for Luna? Especially considering how much we
depend on CDT and [1]. I'm all for moving ahead and make Java 7 minimum
required version for our 3.0
