On 04/26/2012 04:33 PM, Daniel HB wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:24 -0300, Rafael M Teixeira wrote:
Some plugins (most of Valgrind tools, gprof and gcov, for example)
rely
on the original binary to display info in the view, such as line
numbers
and function names. This means we would have to w
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:24 -0300, Rafael M Teixeira wrote:
>
> Some plugins (most of Valgrind tools, gprof and gcov, for example)
> rely
> on the original binary to display info in the view, such as line
> numbers
> and function names. This means we would have to whether save a
> snapshot
> of
On 04/24/2012 12:40 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
On 04/24/2012 12:21 PM, Daniel HB wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
* Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
I've been asked multiple times about post-mo
On 04/24/2012 04:45 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools.
I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just
wasn't part of the original workflows of a lot of
On 04/24/2012 05:11 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
[...]
Maybe simpler is better?
How about a view menu item: "Open..." which allows you to choose
the file you want to open. Maybe also specify a binary or such other
things for the cases that need them.
+1
X
_
> For Oprofile feature, you may take a look at
> http://linorg.usp.br/eclipse/technology/linuxtools/videos/eclipse-oprofile-demo.ogg
> demo video (see 1:36'' and then 2:45'').
FWIW these (somewhat old now) screencasts are linked from our downloads
page:
http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/downlo
> Just a head's up: Oprofile plug-in has such as "save & compare"
> feature
> implemented. It is really useful to compare runs when you have just
> changed source code.
>
> For Oprofile feature, you may take a look at
> http://linorg.usp.br/eclipse/technology/linuxtools/videos/eclipse-oprofile-dem
On 04/24/2012 11:39 AM, Xavier Raynaud wrote:
On 04/24/2012 04:12 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
[...]
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools. The main use case in question was to be able to visualize
results taken on a remote target than cannot run Eclipse.
Ultima
On 04/24/2012 12:21 PM, Daniel HB wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
* Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools.
I personaly think that it'
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > > > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > > > >LinuxTools.
> > > >
> > > > I personaly think that it's usef
* Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > > >LinuxTools.
> > >
> > > I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
> >
> > I agree it's very useful and would love to s
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Daniel HB
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:06 AM
> To: Linux Tools developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
>
> On
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > >LinuxTools.
> >
> > I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
>
> I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just
> wasn't part of the
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Overholt
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 10:45 AM
> To: Linux Tools developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
&g
> >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> >LinuxTools.
>
> I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just
wasn't part of the original workflows of a lot of the plugins we have.
Maybe a good gener
On 04/24/2012 04:12 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
[...]
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools. The main use case in question was to be able to visualize
results taken on a remote target than cannot run Eclipse.
Ultimately, supporting LinuxTools running remotely is
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Daniel HB
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:57 AM
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
>
> On Tue, 2
> One way to make it work would be creating a separated view, like
> "post-mortem Cachegrind analysis", where you have freedom to open any
> cachegrind file (even if it's unrelated to any C/C++ project you have
> on
> the workspace).
Agreed, the linking to source files is such a benefit IMO that i
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:33 +0200, Xavier Raynaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a question about valgrind integration.
> I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem. (The best will be
> to open them with a simple double-click).
>
> Is it currently possible ?
I don't think so. In the way Valgri
> I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem.
Most of the workflows we've targetted in the past were not for post
mortem analysis but for as-you-develop type of analysis. That being
said, I can't speak to the cachegrind case.
Andrew
___
linux
Hi,
I've a question about valgrind integration.
I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem. (The best will be
to open them with a simple double-click).
Is it currently possible ?
Xavier Raynaud
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-de
21 matches
Mail list logo
