Re: [Liquibase-user] CLOB vs. LONGTEXT

2009-03-16 Thread David C. Hicks
ing > created, however, the context (or "dbms" attribute) route may be the > easiest. > > Nathan > > -Original Message- > From: David C. Hicks [mailto:dhi...@i-hicks.org] > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:01 AM > To: Liquibase Users > Subject: [Liquibase-

Re: [Liquibase-user] CLOB vs. LONGTEXT

2009-03-16 Thread Voxland, Nathan
- From: David C. Hicks [mailto:dhi...@i-hicks.org] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:01 AM To: Liquibase Users Subject: [Liquibase-user] CLOB vs. LONGTEXT Hi folks, Making some headway on setting up in-memory, test databases, but I've encountered a "type" problem. We currently define a

[Liquibase-user] CLOB vs. LONGTEXT

2009-03-16 Thread David C. Hicks
Hi folks, Making some headway on setting up in-memory, test databases, but I've encountered a "type" problem. We currently define a couple of columns as the type LONGTEXT, because we anticipate storing really large strings of data. If I understood my reading of the Liquibase docs, it is pref