Re: [lisp] Comments to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-00.txt

Your email (see below) says the main point of the draft is to document the behavior of ODL. If that is truly the main point, why shouldn't it go into the draft. Generalizing to an SDN usage could mean all sorts of intentions. I look forward to discussing this at the WG meeting. Dino > On Se

Re: [lisp] Comments to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-00.txt

Hi Dino, the draft says, right in the abstract, that: "This extension is intended to be used in some SDN deployments that use LISP as a southbound protocol with (P)ITRs that are compliant with [RFC6830 ]." I don't think we need to qualify that any further.

Re: [lisp] Comments to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-00.txt

> Hi Dino, > thanks for your replay. > > The main goal of this draft is to document what is implemented in ODL > (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Architecture), > with the hope that comments and feedback will help us improve that solution, > and facilitate inte

Re: [lisp] Comments to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-00.txt

Hi Dino, thanks for your replay. The main goal of this draft is to document what is implemented in ODL (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Architecture), with the hope that comments and feedback will help us improve that solution, and facilitate interoperability.

Re: [lisp] Comments to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-00.txt

> Since there are no configured database mappings on PITRs, you have to > specifiy what actually is put in the EID-record. I suggest an AFI=0 or an > EID-record count of 0. > > That's a way to do it. Probably we'd need to do some interoperability test to > see how the different implementations

Re: [lisp] Comments to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-00.txt

Good comments Dino. See inline. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: > Hi guys, thanks for the draft. I have some comments. But to note, in > private discussions, we have talked about a more general mechanism that is > in another draft to be published. Thanks Alberto for contri

[lisp] Comments to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-00.txt

Hi guys, thanks for the draft. I have some comments. But to note, in private discussions, we have talked about a more general mechanism that is in another draft to be published. Thanks Alberto for contributing to both drafts. For others on the list, the main difference is the use of Map-Notify v