Re: [lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-10-15 Thread Dino Farinacci
> What I suggest is that I add specific text about this in the 6834bis > document. Do you agree? Agree. Dino ___ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-10-15 Thread Luigi Iannone
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 15:13, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:49 AM Luigi Iannone > wrote: > Hi, > > > On 15 Oct 2018, at 04:20, Dino Farinacci > > wrote: > > > >>> Well this is true, but 6833bis discusses RLOC-reacha

Re: [lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-10-15 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:49 AM Luigi Iannone wrote: > Hi, > > > On 15 Oct 2018, at 04:20, Dino Farinacci wrote: > > > >>> Well this is true, but 6833bis discusses RLOC-reachability and there > >>> is a RLOC-probe cache that will tell the ITR when it last heard from > >>> the RLOC. > >> > >> Jus

Re: [lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-10-15 Thread Luigi Iannone
Hi, > On 15 Oct 2018, at 04:20, Dino Farinacci wrote: > >>> Well this is true, but 6833bis discusses RLOC-reachability and there >>> is a RLOC-probe cache that will tell the ITR when it last heard from >>> the RLOC. >> >> Just to be clear, it's not "last heard from" that you need, but >> rather

Re: [lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-10-14 Thread Dino Farinacci
> > Well this is true, but 6833bis discusses RLOC-reachability and there > > is a RLOC-probe cache that will tell the ITR when it last heard from > > the RLOC. > > Just to be clear, it's not "last heard from" that you need, but > rather "last verifiably responded". Right agree. > > > S 16. > >

Re: [lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-10-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
> There are diff files attach for revisions 68830bis-24 and 6833bis-18. They have not been posted yet. > > > S 4.1. > >>RLOC (outer-header source IP address) in a received LISP packet.. > >>Such a cache entry is termed a "glean mapping" and only contains > >>a single RLOC fo

Re: [lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-09-27 Thread Dino Farinacci
Doing the same as I did with Ben’s email. Fixing the simple stuff first. The simple changes (editorial) will be submitted in -21. > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > S 5.3

[lisp] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-09-27 Thread Eric Rescorla
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https