Here's amendment 13:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/amendment13.htm
And here's the Registrar License and Agreement
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/rla42199.htm
In case anybody missed them.
Bill Lovell
Mr. Buchanan and all,
I am cc'ing this back to the IFWp list to insure that YOU and your
chorines understand me very clearly.
First, I support President Clinton's decision to launch air strikes
on Yugoslavia and the Molosovich regime. The only mistake
is that these strikes were not hard enoug
Phil and all,
Phil Howard wrote:
William X. Walsh wrote:
> As a web hosting provider, I would not want to tarnish my reputation
> by being associated in any way with certain types of sites.
As a
> service provider, I feel there is some obligation to let other
> providers know when questionable c
William and all,
William X. Walsh wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 16:15:22 -0700, "Roeland M.J.
Meyer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>William and I part company on this one and I'm surprised to find myself
siding with Santagata here. Michael Bryan is saying the same thing, the
right-think way. There sh
Michael and all,
You are essentially correct Michael. The William Walsh's and ICANN's
of the world would have all of us give up our rights to freedom of thought
and an open forum for expression of those thought in the DNS, unless
it fit's their vision. I believe this subject that these sort o
All,
This may be of interest to some. It appears that another battle
on the PSO is in the brewing...
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Roeland and all,
Here Here! Exactly right. However it is not just the left wing political movement
here that is at fault but the Right wing just a much. I thankfully do not
belong to either the Democratic or Republican party's I would not wish
to be tarnished with their political dribble and
All,
ROFLMAO! William, your reputation is already trashed and in the
incinerator. It is now only a matter of it being set alight. Soon
all that will be left is smoke and Ash... And if you keep this sort
of disingenuous attitude up, that will be sooner rather than later.
Note: Brian, her
Michael and all,
Well said Michael, very well said indeed. You follow my sentiments
as well as it appears James's as well. This has been the slippery
slope that Mr Walsh and the ICANN to a even greater extent would
have us follow none the less. One that is repressive, and in stark
disagreeme
James and all,
Well responded to James, very well done indeed. I concur completely.
This type of Malosavich attitude that Mr. Walsh displays is indeed
despicable and very troubling indeed.
James Santagata wrote:
> At 09:35 PM 4/22/99 GMT, William X. Walsh wrote:
> >On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 14:29:
All,
It appears that Mr. Walsh is a strong believer in Censorship
in some form or another. Mr. Walsh, maybe you should move
to Belgrade Yugoslavia, I am sure that you would be very happy there!
Although it is a bit noisy there right now. Small price to pay for your
philosophical beliefs, eh?
Kumquats
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:26:35 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>James and all,
>
> Well said James, very well said indeed. Censorship in any of its
>forms is WRONG. Folks/kooks like Mr. Walsh whom believe in the
>idea of selective censorship would take us all down to e
James and all,
Well said James, very well said indeed. Censorship in any of its
forms is WRONG. Folks/kooks like Mr. Walsh whom believe in the
idea of selective censorship would take us all down to exactly what
they wish to avoid, yet are too blinded to see it...
James Santagata wrote:
> At
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, William X. Walsh writes:
> Give it up, Rhonda, the course won't be reversed
Give it up, William, you have as much chance to get any measure of
input into ICAN than your alter ego (Jeff the Man) or the cybercops.
el
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:18:51 -0400 (EDT)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Rex
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
>>From cwix.com!rex.barnes Thu Apr 22 15:18:50 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAI
WHO'S KING OF THE DOMAINS NOW? (BUS. Wednesday)
http://www.wired.com/news/news/email/explode-infobeat/business/story/19246.h
tml
Will throwing open domain-name registration change the Net at
all? Or are new domains, such as .store and .law, needed for
real compe
Kumquats
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 11:44:03 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>All,
>
> I wonder how exactly the ICANN or the DNSO expects to
>exact any authority for doing this, and in particular in
>any TLD name space that is not .com, .net, .org? In addition
>in that a domain name i
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:37:41 -0400 (EDT), Ronda Hauben
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The research I am proposing will be to examine the role
>played by government (especially the U.S. government, but if
>possible other governments as well) in the development of the
>Internet. And there will
Kumquats
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 10:13:10 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Esther and all,
>
> Well you and the ICANN Interim Board have some audacity to be making this
>sort of statement!! Your own Accreditation Policy seeks to remove
>any privacy that now exists. Hence I as do
All,
I wonder how exactly the ICANN or the DNSO expects to
exact any authority for doing this, and in particular in
any TLD name space that is not .com, .net, .org? In addition
in that a domain name is now considered legal property,
such a provision is not within the purview of ICANN either.
H
Michael and all,
Yes indeed we [INEGroup] reviewed the now Accreditation policy
set by the ICANN Interim Board in great detail as well as had a legal
review done. The conclusion's were posted to the ICANN relevant
E-Mail depositories, and seemingly went unread or unheeded as they
ICANN decided
FYI:
Iperdome to Organize Netizens for Internet Governance
ATLANTA, April 22 /PRNewswire/ -- Iperdome, Inc., the company offering
Personal Domain Name services under the .per(SM) name and Top Level Domain
(TLD), has formed the Personal Domain Name Holders Association
(http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
On this point I have to agree with you completely. The thought that
an overseeing agency should be responsible for the integrity of data
for disparate systems is contrary to both the nature of the Internet
and good business practice.
The EU
Esther and all,
Well you and the ICANN Interim Board have some audacity to be making this
sort of statement!! Your own Accreditation Policy seeks to remove
any privacy that now exists. Hence I as do many others, find your
policy statements and posts such as this yet again disjointed and
disin
The Role of Government in the Development of the Internet
Paper Proposal
by Ronda Hauben
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are many myths about the role that government has
played in the development o
A number of comments:
This is one step, not the last or only step.
In the scheme of things, services are starting to matter more than products.
Competition in services is a worthy start.
Esther Dyson
At 11:19 AM 21/04/99 -0500, David Schutt wrote:
>My goodness, a P.T. Barnum for the 21st Cent
Please note that some people (me included) consider the EU data directive to
be unnecessarily rigid and to represent government regulation in an area
where individuals should be allowed to make their own choices. The US
approach requires better citizen education than now exists, to be sure, but
th
21 April, 1999
Dear Ms. Schaffer van Houweling,
We wish to form the following constituency in the DNSO:
The Individual Domain Name Owners' constituency (IDNO),
to be named the Cyberspace
Association.
Joining criteria: Owning a Domain Name as an
individual and having sole control over it.
28 matches
Mail list logo
