Well, check out http://www.4netnames.com and see if you can work out who
that represents!
Ivan
Ivan Pope
NetNames
Managing Your Internet Identity
http://www.netnames.com
180-182 Tottenham Court Road
London, W1P 9LE
+44 171 291 3900
+44 171 291 3939 (Fax)
-Original Message-
From:
Richard,
I believe it was Mike Roberts who used the term "everyone's
favorite monopoloy."
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
Richard J. Sexton
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 1999 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re:
I note that the minutes from the May 27th Board Meeting have not yet been
posted to the ICANN web site? Any ETA?
http://www.icann.org/minutes/notes-minutes.html
-- Bret
Mark Measday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Sondow wrote:
Your editorializing seems at variance with the text. Surely the text
should be read as follows, namely that, at face value, the admission
that the Australian government and others are willing to concede
sovereignty to an
Bret and all,
This is interesting indeed. I believe according to the ICANN's own
Bylaws that they are supposed to be posted within 7 days
Bret A. Fausett wrote:
I note that the minutes from the May 27th Board Meeting have not yet been
posted to the ICANN web site? Any ETA?
For god's sake, Ronda, if you're going to post, will you please do
it correctly? I did NOT write what you attribute to me, below!
Ronda Hauben wrote:
Mark Measday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Sondow wrote:
Your editorializing seems at variance with the text. Surely the text
should
All,
Who is the REAL Tabnet.com? Is it Register.com's subsidiary or
affiliate? or is wwwtabnet.com an affiliate of Register.com? Or are
they all affiliates of Verio.com? Which is the ICANN Testbed registrar
of record other than Register.com? (See whois for more interesting
details on
I like that advantage! :)
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
Richard J. Sexton
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: Testbed registrar
What competitive advantage does Register.com bring?
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/te/2891/1.html
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/te/2888/1.html
Stefen Krempl's Articles on The ICANN Berlin meetings
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap puller of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Moving this to lists where it belongs.
What Mr Roberts fails to mention is that the INTERIM board has no
authority to be making MANY of the decisions it has been making under
the white paper and indeed its own charter.
This boards primary goal was supposed to be getting an ELECTED board
in
At 11:09 AM 6/11/99 +1200, you wrote:
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/te/2891/1.html
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/te/2888/1.html
Stefen Krempl's Articles on The ICANN Berlin meetings
It's alright for you Joop, but for thos eof us that don't
speak two-dozen languages, it looks
All,
NSOL stock pops again +6 as ICANN's bet on AOL as a new
registrar of Domain Names slumps 5 1/2...
NSI (NSOL) regains upward climb with on news of deal with Infospace
see:
June 10, 1999
Michael Sondow
ICIIU
via email,
Dear Mr. Sondow:
My support is behind you.
Please do your best to support the non-commercial domain name holders.
Tom Lowenhaupt
The Communisphere(R) Project
RIand mine
RIAt 01:45 PM 6/10/99 -0500, Kevin M. Kelly wrote:
RIMichael,
RI
RIYou
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 18:11:56 +0100, Jeff Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
NSOL stock pops again +6 as ICANN's bet on AOL as a new
registrar of Domain Names slumps 5 1/2...
NSOL still down for the quarter overall.
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 10 21:00:50 1999
Received: from ns1.vrx.net (vrx.net [204.138.71.254])
by mail1.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixM1.3) with SMTP id VAA11246
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (13962 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
via
Oh spare us Rhonda. Are you still on this diatribe?
Your interpretation here has been twisted totally out of context, as
can be seen by anyone who actually reads the relevent references.
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:59:54 -0400 (EDT), Ronda Hauben
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But also the U.S. govt
William, Rhonda and all,
It appears that Rhonda is referring to a potential conflict of
laws pertaining to this process. And that conflict is not
difficult to see as potentially in existence, and may later come
back an haunt ICANN as some point.
It also seems relatively obvious that David
I think Roberts deserves praise for engaging in the debate. This is a conversation we
need to have. See comments below.
Commentary on Professor David Post's Essay of June 5 Concerning ICANN
ICANN is pursuing
its work program as spelled out in the Government's White Paper on the
Management
At 12:08 AM 6/11/99 , Milton Mueller wrote:
I think Roberts deserves praise for engaging in the debate.
A private message to David Post, forwarded
by Vint Cerf to the closed ISOC list, leaked
to the public lists, is hardly "engaging in
the debate" ;-)
This is a conversation we
need to
You may have (inadvertently) been sent a trojan horse email virus
called Explore.exe that is propagating throughout the Internet. It
installs itself on your computer when you open the attached file in
a message such as:
Hi !
I received your email and I shall send you a reply ASAP.
20 matches
Mail list logo
