Kent:
Stop batting at the fictional ferries floating bout your head. Your
getting close to the point of libel. Do you have money?
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:52:44PM -0400, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
Guilty as charged, Kent. I do DNS for a lot of
Kent Crispin wrote:
It is the evidence of pervasive deception: fake businesses, fake
organizations, fake email addresses, fake names, fake people.
You mean like Javier Sola's "European Internet Business
Association"? Or like CORE itself, incorporated illegally in
Switzerland and guilty of
John, Matthew and all,
John provides good advise, as far as it goes. He would rather hear
the same message over and over again that is total agreement
with his myopic views. That is fine, but it isn't reality. Yes I often
disagree with John, as I do others. That is what debate and real
Andrew McLaughlin wrote:
The ICANN Board of Directors held its third quarterly
meeting in Santiago,
Chile, today. The Board passed a number of resolutions,
including the
following:
...
- Implementation of At Large Membership
"Implementation" is an interesting descriptor for what was
Hi Eric,
I understand that voting will only occur when
5,000 people
sign up for
membership. A small fraction of that number
have
The whole scheme was concocted to allow ICANN
board and staff to control the election of their
replacements and, more importantly, to reduce
any means of
Hi, Eric--
I left your full posting in this message, because it certainly bears
repeating. What you have missed, to make matters worse, is that the At
Large membership won't even be able to hold direct elections. Instead, it
will be voting for 18 members of an At Large Council who will SELECT
EDUCAUSE WASHINGTON UPDATE --- AUGUST 27, 1999
DNS PRIVATIZATION:
ICANN APPROVES COMPROMISE WITH DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AS HOUSE
COMMERCE COMMITTEE CHAIR INITIATES INVESTIGATION OF FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES
DNS PRIVATIZATION
ICANN APPROVES COMPROMISE WITH DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Kerry Miller)]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 19:15:44 -0400 (EDT)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27
The ICANN board also agreed to "provisionally" recognize the Non-commercial
Domain Name Holders constituency of the Domain Name Supporting Organization
until the board's meeting this November. A petition to create another group
representing individuals' policy interests was rejected by the board
Eric and all,
No, you said it all here Eric. This whole thing is a travesty is
about all
I can add... :( But I have been expecting something like this from
this
ICANN (Initial?) Interim board. It is just simply another example of a
direct
attempt to thwart the White Paper...
Eric Weisberg
Tony and all,
Indeed this whole "Procedure" does indeed look like some sort
of concoction that Jones Day and Joe Sims would come up with.
I only hope that the House Commerce Commission will take a close
look into this situation...
A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
Hi Eric,
I understand that voting will
My nose insists upon telling me that I smell something putrid.
This malady started when on internet.com I first read "ICANN
Adopts Cyber-Squatting Policy" and then "ICANN gets Financial
Boost." Is that not what many of us have been concerned about
for years now, that ICANN was for sale by the
Bill and all,
Good points Bill. I just wonder how long this ICANN circus act
is going to be allowed to continue in this manner
Bill Lovell wrote:
My nose insists upon telling me that I smell something putrid.
This malady started when on internet.com I first read "ICANN
Adopts
13 matches
Mail list logo
