Re: [IFWP] date of new york times quote on esthers inter est indoing real work? and to hell with process??

1999-09-25 Thread Ellen Rony
>Does anyone have the date and contest for this outstanding comment? Internet Body Feels Democracy's Tug, by Jeri Clausing (NYTimes) http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/08/biztech/articles/30ican.html 30-Aug-99 > > >In a recent New York Times article, Esther Dyson >was quoted as saying "Wi

RE: [IFWP] date of new york times quote on esthers inter est in

1999-09-25 Thread William X. Walsh
http://www.dnspolicy.com/news/99/08/30/1418234.shtml On 26-Sep-99 Gordon Cook wrote: > Does anyone have the date and contest for this outstanding comment? > > > > In a recent New York Times article, Esther Dyson > was quoted as saying "With all due respect, we > are less interested in compla

[IFWP] date of new york times quote on esthers inter est in doing realwork? and to hell with process??

1999-09-25 Thread Gordon Cook
Does anyone have the date and contest for this outstanding comment? In a recent New York Times article, Esther Dyson was quoted as saying "With all due respect, we are less interested in complaints about process" and more interested in "doing real work and moving forward." *

[IFWP] domain names and east timor

1999-09-25 Thread J. Baptista
Hello: I just wondering, why would the US government and the brits have anything to do with the top level domain for east timor. Is there a political thing going on here? Cheers Joe Baptista -- Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Access Internet Researc

[IFWP] Re: Basket and eggs, was Re: ICANN and IBM

1999-09-25 Thread Jeff Williams
Ed and all, Well done here Ed. You couldn't be more correct. But as you can tell from John Patricks own words, is that this is not of great concern to the GIP , IBM or the ICANN for that matter. Ed Gerck wrote: > John: > > I applaud your initiative of coming forward with a reasoning for the

[IFWP] [Attention John Patrick] to:Re: ICANN and IBM

1999-09-25 Thread Jeff Williams
Gordon and all, especially you John Patrick, Agreed Gordo. Nice try here John, but that interesting piece of PR BS, didn't stick to the wall, so to speak! >;) Try again. Hay John, hows your old buddy George Sorros doing these days? I hear that the DOJ is looking into some of his investment

[IFWP] Re: ICANN and IBM - The saga...

1999-09-25 Thread Jeff Williams
Russ and all, "This Guy" as you put it is the head of the gip see http://www.gip.org for more information. His name John Patrick. I agree with you for the most part. John's post was a very nice TRY at shmoozing. Some will believe it, most in "The Know" will not. Nice piece of political BS t

Re: [IFWP] from IP ICANN and IBM

1999-09-25 Thread Jay Fenello
Marie Antoinette, when told that her people were starving and had no bread to eat, replied: "Let them eat cake!" Hello John, Could it be that you are so insulated behind your castle walls, that you are not hearing the cries of the people? Your comments in support of ICANN ignore the most

[IFWP] ICANN and IBM

1999-09-25 Thread patrick
Recently there has been a lot of discussion about ICANN and the role IBM plays in the organization's efforts. A lot of what I have read is inaccurate and I'd like to use this posting to clarify what's really going on. Let me start with my strong belief -- shared by IBM, government leaders and m

Re: [IFWP] from IP ICANN and IBM

1999-09-25 Thread Gordon Cook
Yet another propaganda piece artfully and deceptively designed to reassure those who haven't been paying close attention to facts of what this unsuable unaccountable clique is doing. The pattern of deception continues. ISOC, Vint cerf, Patrick himself, Roberts, Dyson continue to manuever in

Re: [IFWP] from IP ICANN and IBM (fwd)

1999-09-25 Thread J. Baptista
John Patrick confirms his position and statements: -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:26:14 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: J. Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [IFWP] from IP ICANN and IBM (fwd) Yes, I did. John Patrick Vice President - Internet Techno

[IFWP] from IP ICANN and IBM

1999-09-25 Thread David Farber
>Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1904 05:51:29 -0500 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: ICANN and IBM >Cc: >Bcc: >X-Attachments: > >[please note this is from John Patrick from IBM not me (some IPers >assume everything they read comes from me :-) djf] > > >Dave, recently th

[IFWP] NO COST .com, .net or .org (fwd)

1999-09-25 Thread J. Baptista
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 06:56:46 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Referred by [CENSORED] Hello, You are receiving this message because your friend [CENSORED] has pre-registered for a soon to be launched service featuring a NO COST .com, .ne

No Subject

1999-09-25 Thread J. Baptista
http://www.idg.net/idgns/1999/09/24/IDirectionsPromisesFreecomRegistration.shtml IDirections promises free '.com' registration by James Niccolai, IDG News Service\San Francisco Bureau

Re: [IFWP] DNS News URL's Sep/99

1999-09-25 Thread Jeff Williams
Richard,   Thanks richard for passing this on.  Good cronology, although somewhat disappointing.  But this is really only the end of the beginning for ICANN.  Much more is yet to come. Richard J. Sexton wrote: The nice thing about Septemebr 1999 was, no matter which side of the debate you're on,