[IFWP] Objection to Working Group C Report to ICANN

2000-03-08 Thread Ellen Rony
Posted at the request of the author of the following, Bob Broxton, of Richmond, Virginia. === OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF THIS REPORT AS "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKING GROUP C OF THE DOMAIN NAME SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION, INTERNET CORPORATION

Re: [IFWP] How To Fight the Corporate Takeover of the Internet

2000-03-08 Thread Jeff Williams
Nancy and all, Nancy, thank you very much for your reply. We [INEGroup] are not very encouraged by ICANN's past history in holding elections, as you may know. We are also very concerned regarding policy making by ICANN that has already taken place without Stakeholder consent. From our

Re: [IFWP] Objection to Working Group C Report to ICANN

2000-03-08 Thread Michael Sondow
Ellen Rony wrote: Posted at the request of the author of the following, Bob Broxton, of Richmond, Virginia. snip 6. The issuance of this report, without the members of Working Group C approving, either the language in the report or granting this authority to the co-chairman, sets a

Re: [IFWP] Objection to Working Group C Report to ICANN

2000-03-08 Thread Richard J. Sexton
Isn't it time to wake up? We need bumper stickers and T-Shirts: ICANN - that's pronounced "IAHC". -- [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dnso.com It's about travel on expense accounts to places with good beer. - BKR