The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to resellers if
admin defaults.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 23:01:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Coolfred Internet Services [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Transfers: A
That's an interesting twist. I don't think the Canadian courts would much
care about a lower US courts decision. But the location of control is a
valid point. I'll pass it on.
Regards
Joe
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to
You might be interested in the development of administration of the
Swedish national top level domain (ccTLD) .se.
Today (2000-04-03) the Swedish government special investigator Jorgen
Holgersson released his report on the administration of .se.
First some basic facts on the current system as
David Harris made a suggestion to update the root servers in real time and
I was wondering if NSI found this a practicle solution for implimentation.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:01:29 -0400
From: David Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: !Dr.
ICANN wrote:
The DNSO Names Council invites the Internet community to comment
on these reports and the issues raised by them.
What about the general Assembly of the DNSO? You remember, the
"bottom-up", "consensus" community? Doesn't that exist any more? Did
you destroy it by demoralizing
ICANN wrote:
The DNSO Names Council invites the Internet community to comment
on these reports and the issues raised by them.
What about the General Assembly of the DNSO? You remember, the
"bottom-up", "consensus" community called on by the White Paper to
form ICANN and the DNSO? Are you
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
David Harris made a suggestion to update the root servers in real time and
I was wondering if NSI found this a practicle solution for implimentation.
http://www.ultradns.com.
Greg Skinner wrote:
There have been commercial registrations in .us for quite some time
now.
And I tell you, once again, that although they have never been
disallowed they are not the principal purpose of .us, as the RFC
makes clear.
Your extrapolation from some commercial use of .us, to .us
Michael Sondow wrote:
Greg Skinner wrote:
There have been commercial registrations in .us for quite some time
now.
And I tell you, once again, that although they have never been
disallowed they are not the principal purpose of .us, as the RFC
makes clear.
Your reading of the RFC is
Greg Skinner wrote:
Your reading of the RFC is different than mine, as I have it in front
of me now and see no language stating (or implying) anything about the
principal purpose of .us.
You don't? What about the following, which you yourself quote:
Any computer in the United States
From: "Network Solutions" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Customer Feedback Request
--
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
Dear NSI Customer,
Network Solutions appreciates your business. We also value
your input, which
The text boxes aren't big enough to type text all the way to the end of the box.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ph-1.613.473.1719
It's about travel on expense accounts to places with good beer. - BKR
FYI:
An Internet Awakening
by Jay Fenello
An Aligning With Purpose(sm) Column
From Deepak Chopra's latest book, to the current format
of The Oprah Winfrey Show, I am constantly amazed at the
exploding interest in the Personal Growth/Spirituality
movement. It's almost as if the
13 matches
Mail list logo
