As you may know, ICANN suddenly announced last week that it has formed
Election and Nominating Committees, without any visible public input.
The announcement is at
http://www.icann.org/announcements/icann-pr09may00.htm .
Commentary suggesting that there were a few flaws in the process can be
I was not consulted. Jamie
"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote:
As you may know, ICANN suddenly announced last week that it has formed
Election and Nominating Committees, without any visible public input.
The announcement is at
I was not consulted either.
I suspect Mike Roberts means that he
consulted the same people who put him
in office ;-)
Jay.
At 10:01 AM 5/16/00, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
As you may know, ICANN suddenly announced last week that it has formed
Election and Nominating
I'm on WG-B, and am an At Large Member (awaiting, along with everyone else,
my pin.)
I ***was not*** consulted.
Judith Oppenheimer
800 Dot Com News, Intelligence, Consulting FREE Daily HeadsUp Headlines.
"...superb real-time source..." "...invaluable..."
"...indispensable..."
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:05:57AM -0400, Dan Steinberg wrote:
For that matter, neither was I.
James Love wrote:
I was not consulted. Jamie
Neither was I, and I don't believe anyone else was either. When
people around ICANN talk about "outreach" or "broad diversity" or
"consensus",
In order to test this intuition, I would be very interested in hearing
from anyone who was actually consulted by ICANN prior to this
announcement, whatever their affiliation.
Not consulted. Disappointed, but not surprised.
Was anyone on the original Membership Advisory Committee consulted?
I
Mike Roberts, ICANN CEO, is quoted in the New York Times as saying,
in regard to the At-large Nominating Committee: "ICANN directors and
staff worked hard to consult widely in the process of forming these
committees".
The simple answer to the question "Why aren't there any at-large
Internet
Ellen Rony wrote
Was anyone on the original Membership Advisory Committee consulted?
The MAC served its purpose - to distract and immobilize user
opposition to ICANN - and is now forgotten.
Michael Sondow I.C.I.I.U.
They didn't consult me - and they were warned in Cairo that would be a bad
thing.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
As you may know, ICANN suddenly announced last week that it has formed
Election and Nominating Committees, without any
Well, I was on the MAC and I forgot to mention it last time round
when I mentioned that I hadnt been consulted.
Ellen Rony wrote:
In order to test this intuition, I would be very interested in hearing
from anyone who was actually consulted by ICANN prior to this
announcement, whatever
10 matches
Mail list logo
