Re: [IFWP] Network Solutions - ATTENTION - what's happening with this?

2000-06-01 Thread Jeff Williams
Joe and all, As you know Joe, ICANN/DOC/NTIA is suppose to be doing oversight to prevent these sorts of situations occurring. That oversight has not been occurring as this article, amongst many others in the recent past have reported. !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > Network Solutions - ATTENTION

[IFWP] dot.GOD stats for may

2000-06-01 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
http://god.pccf.net/admin/stats-2000-06-01/index.htm regards Joe Baptista

[IFWP] Censored Critique of Top-Down Policies in Non-Commercial Name Space

2000-06-01 Thread Michael Sondow
The following posting to the nc-tld list - which is run by James Love of CPTech, part of the Nader Organization, and which is supposed to be a list for discussion of proposals for non-commercial TLDs - was rejected by the list moderator, Mr. Love, because he doesn't like criticism and doesn't want

[IFWP] An Open letter to ICANN (fwd)

2000-06-01 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:39:22 -0400 From: Rick Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: An Open letter to ICANN Mr. Mike Roberts CEO ICANN RE: NICANN and the new dot.pod TLD Dear Mr. Roberts, I would like to invite you to join the Boa

Re: [IFWP] Re: "Domain Names Hijacked" news article (fwd)

2000-06-01 Thread Richard J. Sexton
That's real nice and all but idf open-sts allowed a change to the reguistrant by email, then THEY are the problem. NSI stopped doing this years ago. Duh. At 02:50 PM 6/1/00 -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > >-- Forwarded message -- >Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:00:49 -0400 >From: T

[IFWP] Re: "Domain Names Hijacked" news article (fwd)

2000-06-01 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:00:49 -0400 From: Todd Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: "Domain Names Hijacked" news article Yeah .. just one more example of NSI's unwillingness to get off their butts and do anything. This has bee

[IFWP] ICANN defends Internet management [& more!] from IDG.net (fwd)

2000-06-01 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
ICANN DEFENDS INTERNET MANAGEMENT (Source: InfoWorld.com) ICANN's lack of public exposure has led to misconception about this private sector body charged with technical management of the Net, according to Esther Dyson. http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=269032 poor ol ester polyester

[IFWP] Network Solutions - ATTENTION - what's happening with this?

2000-06-01 Thread Patrick Corliss
>From the creation dates bali.com could not have been up for renewal and from the dates in the news article neither was web.net. As far as I know, no registrar would release a name immediately on the expiry date - there is always a period of at least 30 days grace. Name Secure tells me it's usual

[IFWP] Network Solutions - ATTENTION - what's happening with this?

2000-06-01 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
Network Solutions - ATTENTION - what's happening with this? http://www.thestar.com/thestar/editorial/updates/business/2601NEW01d_CI-DOMAIN1.html There should also be some consideration here to pursue criminal action. This is theft. Registrant: Billy Tandoko Kotak Pos 3988 JKP Jakarta Pu

Re: [IFWP] Re: dot.GOD - the latest

2000-06-01 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Andy Gardner wrote: > > >> >Our current stats: > >>> > > >>> >6,865 Domains registered and validated > >>> >1,108 Domain holders > >>> > >>> Average squat factor 6.2. > >> > >>No Harald - we don't have any squat factor. That is an ICANN definiti

Re: [IFWP] Re: dot.GOD - the latest

2000-06-01 Thread Richard J. Sexton
>> >Our current stats: >> > >> >6,865 Domains registered and validated >> >1,108 Domain holders >> >> Average squat factor 6.2. > >No Harald - we don't have any squat factor. That is an ICANN definition >which has only served to give ICANN a black eye and put us in good >

[IFWP] Rejected posting to DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET (fwd)

2000-06-01 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > At 17:14 31.05.2000 -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > >Our current stats: > > > >6,865 Domains registered and validated > >1,108 Domain holders > > Average squat factor 6.2. No Harald - we don't have any squat fact

[IFWP] Re: dot.GOD - the latest

2000-06-01 Thread pccf
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > At 17:14 31.05.2000 -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > >Our current stats: > > > >6,865 Domains registered and validated > >1,108 Domain holders > > Average squat factor 6.2. No Harald - we don't have any squat fac